Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 325331 - sys-fs/zfs-fuse-0.6.9-r1: writable and executable sections
Summary: sys-fs/zfs-fuse-0.6.9-r1: writable and executable sections
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Christian Parpart (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 358697
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-06-24 11:52 UTC by Richard Scott
Modified: 2012-02-26 17:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Richard Scott 2010-06-24 11:52:18 UTC
I get this QA Notice when installing sys-fs/zfs-fuse-0.6.9-r1:

 * QA Notice: The following files contain writable and executable sections
 *  Files with such sections will not work properly (or at all!) on some
 *  architectures/operating systems.  A bug should be filed at
 *  http://bugs.gentoo.org/ to make sure the issue is fixed.
 *  For more information, see http://hardened.gentoo.org/gnu-stack.xml
 *  Please include the following list of files in your report:
 *  Note: Bugs should be filed for the respective maintainers
 *  of the package in question and not hardened@g.o.
 * RWX --- --- usr/sbin/zdb
 * RWX --- --- usr/sbin/zfs
 * RWX --- --- usr/sbin/zfs-fuse
 * RWX --- --- usr/sbin/zpool
 * RWX --- --- usr/sbin/ztest


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-24 12:45:07 UTC
More or less upstream code problem, take a look at e.g.
/usr/portage/media-libs/xvid/files/xvid-1.2.2-noexecstack.patch
for example patch.

Or possibly you can use flag-o-matic.eclass and "append-ldflags -Wl,-z,noexecstack" to workaround it.

Please report this to upstream too.
Comment 2 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-02-26 17:57:56 UTC
Closing since zfs-fuse was removed from tree. But adding bug 358697 to Blocks: -line since if the package is reintroduced to tree, this one should get fixed too.