Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 323801 - Xfce docs should include a hint that a terminal needs to be installed
Summary: Xfce docs should include a hint that a terminal needs to be installed
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: nm (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 323791
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-06-13 16:57 UTC by Christoph Mende (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-06-14 00:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-13 16:57:26 UTC
after a somewhat lengthy discussion on IRC, we've agreed that the docs need a hint (somewhere around "Installing Xfce") that xfce4-meta does not include a terminal and emerging one (for example x11-terms/terminal) is required to have a useful system.
Comment 1 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-13 16:59:51 UTC
wrong blocker
Comment 2 nm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-13 17:17:47 UTC
It already does; line 260 of the raw XML.
Comment 3 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-06-13 19:47:09 UTC
Hi Josh. You are correct that terminal is listed as a "useful but not explicitly required application"

The discussion that was had revolved around this ambiguity. That is, a new user reads the xfce config guide and expects Xfce to be usable after completing Step 2 of the document. But, in reality, they have no terminal! Gentoo is pretty useless without a terminal. So that means they need to drop down to a VT to emerge a terminal. It is suggested that this isn't very user friendly. That is what bug 323791 is about.. We don't want to force x11-terms/terminal on users but we don't want a bad out of the box experience.

What do you think?
Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-06-13 19:48:31 UTC
Or rather, as the doc guru, how can this situation be improved?
Comment 5 nm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-13 23:42:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)

> The discussion that was had revolved around this ambiguity. That is, a new user
> reads the xfce config guide and expects Xfce to be usable after completing Step
> 2 of the document.

And that right there is the user's problem if they stop reading. The docs are there to be read, so if the user decides not to, RESO PEBKAC. I thought "Bah, more handholding!" 

*Except* your next point got me thinking:

> But, in reality, they have no terminal! So that means they need
> to drop down to a VT to emerge a terminal.

If they do fire up startx and don't know how to switch VTs or run the ol' Ctrl-Alt-Bksp trick, then yes, they would seem to be outta luck, since recent xorg-server ebuilds no longer include xterm.

Based on that scenario, in which hopefully the user runs into problems *because* he followed the guide (and not because he *didn't* read it), I added some info about emerging x11-terms/terminal immediately below the hald info.

I left in the original paragraph further down, as it contains extra information about Terminal. Didn't want to clutter up the simple emerge instruction with Terminal's bells & whistles; the detailed description appears later in the doc.

Look okay to you guys?
Comment 6 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-06-14 00:54:47 UTC
that looks good. thx for the speedy help :)