let's collect em here ...
(In reply to comment #0) > let's collect em here ... > The following package is not in the tree (unfortunately). It has built just fine with poppler-0.12.4-r3 but fails to build with poppler-0.14.0 mail-client/claws-mail-pdf-viewer (from my overlay) checking for POPPLER... no configure: error: Can't find Poppler >= 0.4.2 Glib wrapper
(In reply to comment #0) > let's collect em here ... > =dev-python/python-poppler-0.12.1 emerge error ---------------------------------------------------------------- checking for PYPOPPLER... configure: error: Package requirements ( pygtk-2.0 >= 2.10.0, atk >= 1.6.0, poppler-glib >= 0.12 ) were not met: No package 'poppler-glib' found ---------------------------------------------------------------- similar problems with =app-text/xournal-0.4.5-r1 app-text/apvlv (from local overlay)
First of all, this is a tracker, don't post here, just mark your bugs as blocking this one. Next, most of those problems may become invalid in r1, as the reason for them is http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28458
inkscape fail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323283
epdfview fails with poppler-0.14.0 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323297
QA official note here: if you ever so slightly try to unmask poppler 0.14 before the bugs are fixed here, you're going to get us upset so, so much. You knew this would have happened, and you did it anyway. You didn't even consider asking _me_ to run the tinderbox with poppler revdeps (which incidentally is what I'm going to do now).
(In reply to comment #6) > QA official note here: if you ever so slightly try to unmask poppler 0.14 > before the bugs are fixed here, you're going to get us upset so, so much. > > You knew this would have happened, and you did it anyway. You didn't even > consider asking _me_ to run the tinderbox with poppler revdeps (which > incidentally is what I'm going to do now). > +1 and that said, all you have to do is download http://cgit.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/snapshot/poppler-0.14.0.tar.bz2, upload it to Gentoo mirrors, fix SRC_URI to mirror://gentoo/${P}.tar.bz2, delete ChangeLog from DOCS line... and poppler-glib will magically reveal itself, and apps start building fine. above just proofs this was not tested at all
*** Bug 323283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 323291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 323297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Just what I said in the upstream bug - the files are in the git, they're just missing in the tarball. After adding those two cmake macros, poppler-glib builds correctly.
Please test poppler-0.14.0-r1 This bug wont be closed until i have confirmation from someone on gnome team everything is peachy on their side.
(In reply to comment #12) > Please test poppler-0.14.0-r1 > > This bug wont be closed until i have confirmation from someone on gnome team > everything is peachy on their side. > Rebuilding of all dependent packages worked just fine. Thanks!
Tinderbox starting in a few minutes. After the full run executed, I'll be unmasking it (given green lights).
Tinderbox greenlighted this.
*** Bug 323287 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It seems that poppler-0.14.0-r1 solves the problems. However, it cannot be emerged with USE=doc (bug #323409). Those of us with USE=doc in make.conf are still unhappy. Reopening. [I emerged poppler-0.14.0-r1 with USE=-doc and I confirm that python-poppler and inkscape emerge fine after that. However, #323409 should be fixed.]
(In reply to comment #17) > It seems that poppler-0.14.0-r1 solves the problems. However, it cannot be > emerged with USE=doc (bug #323409). Those of us with USE=doc in make.conf are > still unhappy. Reopening. > [I emerged poppler-0.14.0-r1 with USE=-doc and I confirm that python-poppler > and inkscape emerge fine after that. However, #323409 should be fixed.] > sure, that's all true... but we don't need 2 bugs for 1 issue. the doc failure is handled in bug 323409 already.
