Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 32242 - development-sources-2.6.0_beta9 creates wrong symlink
Summary: development-sources-2.6.0_beta9 creates wrong symlink
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: John Mylchreest (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-28 22:37 UTC by Carl A. Dunham
Modified: 2003-11-03 11:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Carl A. Dunham 2003-10-28 22:37:38 UTC
# ls -l /usr/src/linux-beta 
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           30 Oct 28 16:03 /usr/src/linux-beta -> 
linux-2.6.0-test9-patchset-0.2 
# ls -ld /usr/src/linux*test9* 
drwxr-xr-x   18 root     root         4096 Oct 28 16:03 /usr/src/
linux-2.6.0-test9 
 
 
Looks like test8 did the same thing... 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-29 08:39:35 UTC
this was fixed a while ago, please emerge sync and try again.
Comment 2 Carl A. Dunham 2003-10-29 10:08:49 UTC
How long ago? I just re-sync'd and re-emerged, still see the same thing...
Comment 3 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-29 10:22:15 UTC
sorry perhaps i have misunderstood your problem
can you elaborate and then i can possibly answer a little better.
Comment 4 Carl A. Dunham 2003-10-29 10:44:26 UTC
Sure. Installing development-sources-2.6.0-test9 creates a directory:

/usr/src/linux-2.6.0-test9

and a symlink

/usr/src/linux-beta

Unfortunately, the symlink points to

linux-2.6.0-test9-patchset-0.2

which does not exist.

I was able to reproduce this by removing /usr/src/linux-beta and emerging
development-sources.
Comment 5 Radek Podgorny 2003-10-30 01:04:24 UTC
I've used USE=vanilla, right?

Radek
Comment 6 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-30 08:41:59 UTC
closing this bug, package has been masked, and this will be superceeded soon,
hopefully tonight.
Comment 7 Carl A. Dunham 2003-10-30 09:38:22 UTC
I was not using the 'vanilla' USE flag. I think test8 also has this problem...
Comment 8 Radek Podgorny 2003-10-30 10:24:55 UTC
Couldn't you just mask it unstable? This masking thing sucks since it takes
ages to get the ebuild installed. Simple ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch" would be
much better :-(

Radek
Comment 9 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-30 11:04:44 UTC
the reason this has been masked in package.mask is because its simply, broken.
there will be a new one in portage reletively soon.
in the mean timeif your not wanting the vanilla build, then merge gentoo-dev-sources
as that is now the patched 2.6.

development-sources will be scrictly vanilla as of the next portage addition.

tpo install package.masked packages without problems:
mkdir -p /ets/portage
echo "development-sources" > /etc/portage/package.unmask
Comment 10 Radek Podgorny 2003-11-03 09:20:27 UTC
Come on guys... -test8 still as the most recent? This is a shame for Gentoo...
Why not split the packages to one which would be strictly vanilla and the
other with the gentoo patches? Should be no problem...

Radek
Comment 11 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-11-03 11:45:30 UTC
test9 is the most recent, and they have been split.
development-sources hasnt bumped to test9 yet (it was but then masked) for
logistic reasons as changes are going through in kernel.eclass.

the gentoo patched sources are: gentoo-dev-sources and are currently at test9.
Both are holding off until test10 now until we can get eclass changes in
place.

This was done about 4 days ago, perhaps more. less than a day after the test9
dev-sources was masked.