Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 32178 - Updated ebuild for commoncpp2
Summary: Updated ebuild for commoncpp2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: foser (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-28 01:43 UTC by Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-12-07 15:34 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild (commoncpp2-1.0.13.ebuild,1.11 KB, text/plain)
2003-10-28 01:45 UTC, Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED)
Details
the digest (digest-commoncpp2-1.0.13,69 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2003-10-28 01:46 UTC, Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-28 01:43:33 UTC
1.0.13 is out, ebuild included.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-28 01:45:02 UTC
Created attachment 19883 [details]
ebuild
Comment 2 Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-28 01:46:11 UTC
Created attachment 19884 [details]
the digest
Comment 3 Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-07 06:44:17 UTC
bumped.
Comment 4 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-07 09:10:32 UTC
lanius, you were so kind to update the ebuild, would you also care to move it to the dev-cpp category where it belongs these days ? And it's a plus  if you add a metadata.xml file and assign a maintainer, i obviously failed terribly here so maybe you could take that on you as well. While at it, i'm pretty sure it's safe to mark 1.0.12 x86 stable, it has been in testing for quite a while, so that would be the next logical step to take.

Reporter, i'm truly sorry i hadn't taken any action on this bug yet, but sometimes bugs in your own buglist seem less important than bugs for the different teams you work in and snow under in the avalanche that is bugzilla. My neglection of my own buglist is inexcusable though, my apologies.
Comment 5 Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-07 15:34:14 UTC
> lanius, you were so kind to update the ebuild
np

> would you also care to move it to the dev-cpp category where it belongs these days
done

>And it's a plus  if you add a metadata.xml file and assign a maintainer
do you volunteer for this?

> i'm pretty sure it's safe to mark 1.0.12 x86 stable, it has been in testing for quite a while, so that would be the next logical step to take.
correct

> Reporter, i'm truly sorry i hadn't taken any action on this bug yet, but sometimes bugs in your own buglist seem less important than bugs for the different teams you work in and snow under in the avalanche that is bugzilla
that's why i helped you, but it's a pitty that some people can't accept help