Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 32160 - potential problems with linux-2.6.0-test9 patches
Summary: potential problems with linux-2.6.0-test9 patches
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High blocker (vote)
Assignee: John Mylchreest (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-27 17:13 UTC by John (EBo) David
Modified: 2003-10-29 09:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description John (EBo) David 2003-10-27 17:13:02 UTC
While emerging the new linux-2.6.0-test9, several errors poped up which implies that the patches were never actually applied to the source base.

To reproduce:
  on clean system emerge development-sources-2.6.0-beta9
  watch initial messages just after unpacking to /var/tmp/portage where the recient patches are installed.

  EBo --
Comment 1 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-28 10:46:12 UTC
can any one else confirm this?
I cant personally.
Comment 2 Brad House 2003-10-28 10:51:14 UTC
doesn't happen here, though I know the original
development-sources-2.6.0_beta9 that was committed
wasn't good, though that was fixed a few days ago.

Though there is a bug compiling r8169 net driver
on smp systems, which I've got a patch for.

-Brad
Comment 3 John Mylchreest (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-28 10:59:47 UTC
Marking this bug as closed.
John (EBo) could you please test with the newest test9 sources? (theyre not
bumped so you will be required to emerge sync and remerge).
Please comment to this bug if you still have problems.

Brad, thanks for checking, can you please hold off for genpatches 0.3 before
adding, and give me a quick shout first, I may or may not have a fair few
additions by then :)

Thanks
Comment 4 Brad House 2003-10-28 11:16:57 UTC
john, I just uploaded a genpatches-2.6-0.3.tar.bz2 to distfiles, but
have not patched the development-sources yet ... I found a problem
with the development-sources script via the livecd-ng where it wasn't
properly moving the directories b/c it wasn't in the right directory
to do it in, so it stayed named linux-2.6.0-test9, and I didn't check
to see if the patches were actually applied, but the cd's that were 
removed if you diff the _beta9 and the _beta8 were the problem, so
after adding those back in there, it worked fine ....
If you want to add those back in there, that would be great.  Any
idea how to take genpatches-2.6-0.3.tar.bz2 out of distfiles? ;)

-B
Comment 5 John (EBo) David 2003-10-29 04:37:18 UTC
Thanks Brad and John for the replies, and my apologies for not responding
sooner; there is a bit of a flu bug going around...

John:
  I removed the sources, sync'ed, removed the distfiles, and re-emerged the
it... only part of the problem was fixed.  I think Brad has found the problem.
 Here is a clip of emerge's output:

############################################

>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking linux-2.6.0-test9.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/development-sources-
2.6.0_beta9/work
 * Applying genpatches-2.6-0.2.tar.bz2...                               
 [ ok ]
mv: cannot stat `linux-2.6.0-test9': No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: line 75: cd: /var/tmp/portage/development-sources-2.6.0_bet
a9/work/linux-2.6.0-test9-patchset-0.2: No such file or directory
  RM  $(CLEAN_FILES)
  Making mrproper in the srctree
  RM  $(MRPROPER_DIRS) + $(MRPROPER_FILES)

############################################

Brad:
  I'll re-download the test8 sources and try patching the scripts to fix
the problem and report back later.

  EBo --
Comment 6 John (EBo) David 2003-10-29 09:07:02 UTC
note on followup...  editing the ebuild script so it cd's the the proper
place fixed the above problem.

  EBo --