Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 316265 - ebuild for Bitlbee 1.2.6.a
Summary: ebuild for Bitlbee 1.2.6.a
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Cédric Krier
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-04-20 01:43 UTC by Eddie Parker
Modified: 2010-04-29 21:41 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
basic ebuild for 1.2.6a version of bitlbee. (bitlbee-1.2.6a.ebuild,4.71 KB, text/plain)
2010-04-20 01:44 UTC, Eddie Parker
Details
bitlbee-1.2.6a.ebuild (bitlbee-1.2.6a.ebuild,4.73 KB, text/plain)
2010-04-20 12:50 UTC, michael@smith-li.com
Details
use.local.desc-bitlbee-twitter.patch (use.local.desc-bitlbee-twitter.patch,699 bytes, patch)
2010-04-20 12:51 UTC, michael@smith-li.com
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Eddie Parker 2010-04-20 01:43:23 UTC
Hello:

This is a quick and dirty ebuild for bitlbee 1.2.6a.  I'm running it locally - it's literally a copy of the 1.2.4 ebuild.


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Eddie Parker 2010-04-20 01:44:18 UTC
Created attachment 228467 [details]
basic ebuild for 1.2.6a version of bitlbee. 

Attaching the ebuild.
Comment 2 michael@smith-li.com 2010-04-20 12:50:13 UTC
Created attachment 228503 [details]
bitlbee-1.2.6a.ebuild

Among other things that I ignored, bitlbee 1.2.6a supports Twitter if you pass it the right configure flags, so this ebuild adds a useflag for that. As far as I can tell, twitter support doesn't cause any changes in deps.
Comment 3 michael@smith-li.com 2010-04-20 12:51:07 UTC
Created attachment 228505 [details, diff]
use.local.desc-bitlbee-twitter.patch
Comment 4 Wormo (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-21 06:38:57 UTC
Thanks for submitting your version bump, assigning to maintainer
Comment 5 Swoög 2010-04-21 20:06:48 UTC
Err... Since the maintainer didn't give any visible life sign in a previous version bump request ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312901 ), would it be possible to assign this bug report to maintainer-needed@gentoo.org so that at least the sunrise could take this into account ?
Comment 6 Cédric Krier gentoo-dev 2010-04-21 20:28:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Err... Since the maintainer didn't give any visible life sign in a previous
> version bump request ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312901 ), would
> it be possible to assign this bug report to maintainer-needed@gentoo.org so
> that at least the sunrise could take this into account ?
> 

Calm down. We are not supposed to make bump in less then 20 days. I will do the bump request when I will have the time to test it correctly.
Comment 7 Swoög 2010-04-21 20:44:08 UTC
Oh, that's a clear case of reading problem on my side... My bad...
Sorry.
And thanks for your answer.
Comment 8 Yuval Hager 2010-04-26 05:28:46 UTC
This ebuild works for me. Thanks.
Comment 9 Tim Harder gentoo-dev 2010-04-29 00:59:45 UTC
Why was this bug created in addition to the previous version bump (bug #312901) that wasn't resolved yet?

Anyway, it's best to provide a diff between the old ebuild in the tree and the new version so others can easily see what has been changed.
Comment 10 Cédric Krier gentoo-dev 2010-04-29 21:41:46 UTC
Fix in CVS
Thanks