Ebuild request for: sys-apps/gradm-2.1.14-201004061746 pls.
Required for hardened-soruces-2.6.32-r6 and newer.
I pushed it to the overlay for testing. If it works with hardened-sources in portage-tree I suggest for someone with commit-rights to commit it ASAP, so it does not rot in overlay.
From: spender at grsecurity dot net (Brad Spengler) Date: April 13, 2010 1:46:53 PM GMT+02:00 To: cilly <cilly@cilly.mine.nu> Subject: Re: version of gradm On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:40:21PM +0200, cilly wrote: Hi Spender, about: gradm-2.1.14-201004061746 Which grsec-version requires the above gradm? any grsecurity 2.1.14 kernel will do. I only increment the version number (on both gradm and grsecurity) when some incompatibility is introduced in either. The previous update was late sometime in 2009. The most recent update was just a single improvement of having gradm -S report that there was no RBAC existing if a grsecurity kernel wasn't being run or RBAC was disabled from the config. -Brad
(In reply to comment #3) > From: spender at grsecurity dot net (Brad Spengler) > Date: April 13, 2010 1:46:53 PM GMT+02:00 > To: cilly <cilly@cilly.mine.nu> > Subject: Re: version of gradm > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:40:21PM +0200, cilly wrote: > Hi Spender, > > about: > > gradm-2.1.14-201004061746 > > Which grsec-version requires the above gradm? > > any grsecurity 2.1.14 kernel will do. I only increment the version > number (on both gradm and grsecurity) when some incompatibility is > introduced in either. The previous update was late sometime in 2009. > The most recent update was just a single improvement of having gradm -S > report that there was no RBAC existing if a grsecurity kernel wasn't > being run or RBAC was disabled from the config. > > -Brad > pls push to stable portage
Please do not blindly cc me on a bug report that I am already getting mail for. I only need to read the email once not twice hehe.
Commited to CVS Thank you all
