Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 311553 - import with fixes: sci-libs/balbes-db, sci-libs/mmdb, sci-libs/monomer-db
Summary: import with fixes: sci-libs/balbes-db, sci-libs/mmdb, sci-libs/monomer-db
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo/Alt
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Prefix Support (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Prefix
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-26 23:20 UTC by Johan Hattne
Modified: 2010-03-29 18:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Johan Hattne 2010-03-26 23:20:48 UTC
Please keyword sci-libs/balbes-db-6.1.3, sci-libs/mmdb-1.21, sci-libs/monomer-db-0.090729 ~x86-linux.  They merge fine without (almost) any modifications.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:




Actually, I believe sci-libs/balbes-db requires a trivial patch,

        # db files should be executable
-       find "${ED}"/usr/share/balbes/BALBES_0.0.1/ \
+       find "${D}"/usr/share/balbes/BALBES_0.0.1/ \
                -type f \

because the mv two lines above just moved it to ${ED} and not to ${D}
Comment 1 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-03-28 17:27:45 UTC
Justin,
Can you get to these as time allows? please. :)
Comment 2 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-28 17:48:22 UTC
Mmh I am working on the move to prefix for the complete ccp4. Let's see how fast I am.
Comment 3 Johan Hattne 2010-03-28 18:06:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Mmh I am working on the move to prefix for the complete ccp4. Let's see how
> fast I am.

If I remember right, these are the only ones left to keyword ccp4-libs, which in turn blocks *a lot* of CCP4-stuff.
Comment 4 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-28 18:45:05 UTC
sci-libs/mmdb, sci-libs/monomer-db are in.
Comment 5 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-28 20:33:41 UTC
Done.
Comment 6 Johan Hattne 2010-03-29 01:58:33 UTC
I just realised I'd forgotten to mention--the comment about the executable status of db files is a bit misleading.
Comment 7 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-29 05:54:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> I just realised I'd forgotten to mention--the comment about the executable
> status of db files is a bit misleading.
> 

I saw what you meant and fixed it that way.
Comment 8 Johan Hattne 2010-03-29 18:45:21 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I just realised I'd forgotten to mention--the comment about the executable
> > status of db files is a bit misleading.
> 
> I saw what you meant and fixed it that way.

Thanks a lot!

It's really not important, but I was confused by the comment that stated "db files should be executable" followed by a find to change all the files to 644.  Oh, well...

Comment 9 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-29 18:52:33 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > I just realised I'd forgotten to mention--the comment about the executable
> > > status of db files is a bit misleading.
> > 
> > I saw what you meant and fixed it that way.
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> It's really not important, but I was confused by the comment that stated "db
> files should be executable" followed by a find to change all the files to 644. 
> Oh, well...
> 
:) of the *shouldn't* be