Could sci-libs/fftw-2.1.5-r5 please be keyworded ~x86-linux? It compiles fine without any modifications and passes "ebuild test". Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
thanks for the report, done.
Created attachment 225733 [details, diff] Fixes required for prefixed portage. Please consider attached patch to the ebuild. Apologies for not bringing this up earlier--I've confused my overlays. Still compiles and test fine on x86-linux.
Reopening bug due to comment #2.
why do we need version 2 if version 3 is in the tree?
@sci: are you ok with the suggested patch and bumping EAPI=3?
(In reply to comment #4) > why do we need version 2 if version 3 is in the tree? A few packages--mostly scientific--depend on =sci-libs/fftw-2*.
InCvs.