+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #215881 +++ Version 72 has a couple of nice new features (color output! yay!) and generally works better on my system. Simple version bump works, although here I added the following change: -DEPEND="virtual/ada" +DEPEND="|| ( dev-lang/gnat-gcc dev-lang/gnat-gpl )"
Created attachment 221353 [details, diff] updated Makefile patch
(In reply to comment #0) > Simple version bump works, a > -DEPEND="virtual/ada" > +DEPEND="|| ( dev-lang/gnat-gcc dev-lang/gnat-gpl )" Sorry, that should read: -DEPEND="virtual/ada" +DEPEND="|| ( dev-lang/gnat-gcc dev-lang/gnat-gpl ) + sys-libs/ncurses + sys-libs/readline"
If gnat-gcc wouldn't take that long to compile... | -DEPEND="virtual/ada" | +DEPEND="|| ( dev-lang/gnat-gcc dev-lang/gnat-gpl )" Why? It should be the same. > and generally works better on my system. Did you modify the alpine ebuild to apply the (renamed) patches? http://homepage.ntlworld.com/phil.brooke/topal/rel-72/README.html#pine-patches
(In reply to comment #3) > If gnat-gcc wouldn't take that long to compile... Yea, but then it compiles bug-free programs, right? ;) > | -DEPEND="virtual/ada" > | +DEPEND="|| ( dev-lang/gnat-gcc dev-lang/gnat-gpl )" > > Why? It should be the same. I was under the impression it was preferred to do away with virtuals. I may be misinformed there. > > and generally works better on my system. > > Did you modify the alpine ebuild to apply the (renamed) patches? > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/phil.brooke/topal/rel-72/README.html#pine-patches Yes. My local ebuild has the following in src_prepare: if use topal; then if has_version \<=net-mail/topal-64 ; then epatch /usr/share/topal/patches/${P}.patch elif has_version \>=net-mail/topal-65 ; then epatch /usr/share/topal/patches/${P}.patch-1 epatch /usr/share/topal/patches/${P}.patch-2 else die "could not find suitable patch at /usr/share/topal/patches/!" fi fi Come to think of it, I did not try to recompile alpine after installing topal-72, however I have been using topal-67 + alpine-2.00[topal] (from homegrown ebuilds) without issues for some time now, and the patches did not change from 67 -> 72 so I wager they are safe.
Fixed. Thanks (In reply to comment #4) > I was under the impression it was preferred to do away with virtuals. I may be > misinformed there. You are :) > Yes. My local ebuild has the following in src_prepare: > > if use topal; then > if has_version \<=net-mail/topal-64 ; then alpine-2.00-r3 depends on >=topal-72 now so it doesn't need the distinction. I'll remove the old versions (alpine, topal) soon.
