Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 306443 - multilib glibc-2.10 support
Summary: multilib glibc-2.10 support
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: Sparc64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Sparc Porters
URL: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/sp...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-02-22 20:58 UTC by Chris Brown
Modified: 2010-02-25 20:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Chris Brown 2010-02-22 20:58:04 UTC
Following the multilib for Sparc guide
I run into a problem
I have glibc 2.10
The latest multilib glibc binary available is 2.9
portage wont let me downgrade saying it will break the system
Where to from here
Comment 1 Chris Brown 2010-02-24 00:45:41 UTC
I have used an old stage3 with glibc-2.9
installed the binary multilib glibc-2.9
tried to compile multilib gcc

and I get this error

checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
Comment 2 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-24 19:10:18 UTC
As Tiago already explained you through mail, this is pretty much unsupported.

Nevertheless an user asked for an updated stage3 and i did one last month: http://dev.gentoo.org/~armin76/stage3-sparc64-20100111.tar.bz2

Nevertheless you should consider using Debian for the purpose of your machines, since thats what the farm users and admins are used to.
Comment 3 Chris Brown 2010-02-24 22:43:50 UTC
the reason for the old stage3 was so that i could install the pre-compiled multilib glibc with out the need to downgrade
Comment 4 Chris Brown 2010-02-25 01:17:43 UTC
With the following use flags "nls nptl openmp" multilib gcc434 will compile
One of the following flags "fortran gcj mudflap objc" is causing the error
I will now compile a biarch glibc210 and then work out which flag is causing the error
Comment 5 Chris Brown 2010-02-25 03:01:40 UTC
biarch glibc210 compiled usccessfully
Comment 6 Chris Brown 2010-02-25 03:02:06 UTC
* successfully
Comment 7 Chris Brown 2010-02-25 20:38:48 UTC
I'm marking this as "worksforme" on a 2008 stage3
It didn't compile on any of my more up to date systems
I havnt yet tried to recompile again on the newer systems