I couldn't find any other bug referring to openoffice-bin-1.1.0 and it is not yet in portage (although the corresponding source builds are). I've just renamed the openoffice-bin-1.1_rc4.ebuild to openoffice-bin-1.1.0.ebuild and it seems to work well except for bug #28851. Also, isn't it a bit hard to mask the openoffice-bin ebuilds in package.mask? Especially now that they've been released? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Added for x86 - it's ~arch masked, so everyone put on your testing hats!
Thanks Brad, I'll try it out when my Gnome 2.4 build is done... :)