Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 30314 - version bump needed for gnome-common
Summary: version bump needed for gnome-common
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/source...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-10-04 05:48 UTC by WiD
Modified: 2003-10-11 02:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description WiD 2003-10-04 05:48:53 UTC
Current is 2.4.0.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-04 05:59:57 UTC
yes we know about releases, gives us some time.

Another question : do you _use_ this ? I mean, do you use it beyond it being
installed on your system ?
Comment 2 WiD 2003-10-04 06:11:32 UTC
Well it's a dependency of anjuta so I thought I'd report it, but now I know
that I was being far too hasty and it isn't so big of a deal for me so I
apologise for it.
Comment 3 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-04 06:28:10 UTC
not of any anjuta in portage
Comment 4 WiD 2003-10-04 06:41:51 UTC
Well that's odd because when I do emerge -pv anjuta the output is this:
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
 
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild  N    ] dev-util/ctags-5.5-r1
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/ORBit-0.5.17  -nls
[ebuild  N    ] sys-libs/db-1.85-r1
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2  -doc -nls -kde
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/libxml-1.8.17-r2
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/oaf-0.6.10  -nls
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gconf-1.0.8-r5  -nls
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-common-1.2.4-r3
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3  +ssl -nls
[ebuild  N    ] media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0-r2  -doc +mmx
[ebuild  N    ] media-gfx/gnome-iconedit-1.2.0-r5
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-print-0.37  -nls
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/bonobo-1.0.22  -nls
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libglade-0.17-r6  -nls -bonobo
[ebuild  N    ] dev-util/anjuta-1.0.2
Comment 5 Stephane Loeuillet 2003-10-10 16:57:50 UTC
gnome-config is usefull, it's not only to fill the disk with useless junk

it includes gnome-autogen.sh for example, which is used by several apps.
(most time, when compiling gnome stuff from CVS)

it's not high priority, but we could just hope they did some fixes since
the gnome 1.2 days. even if few, they might be worth updating

from the changelog, it is not just a version change, they did fix something
Comment 6 Stephane Loeuillet 2003-10-10 17:11:33 UTC
apps i found using it :

in portage :
gnome-base/gnome-vfs/gnome-vfs-1.0.5-r3.ebuild
net-mail/evolution/evolution-1.2.4.ebuild
net-mail/evolution/evolution-1.2.3.ebuild
anjuta 1.0 was just removed from portage

out of portage :
apotheke CVS
anjuta2 CVS

/home/leroutier/CVS/apotheke/apotheke/autogen.sh:    echo "You need to install
gnome-common from the GNOME CVS"
/home/leroutier/CVS/anjuta/anjuta2/anjuta2/autogen.sh:    echo "You need
to install gnome-common from the GNOME CVS"
/home/leroutier/CVS/anjuta/anjuta2/anjuta2/plugins/gnome-project-types/gnome-application-templates/autogen.sh.template:
   echo "You need to install gnome-common from the GNOME CVS"
Comment 7 Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-10 17:22:51 UTC
This is in fact a very useful package for developers. I can see how this
can be considered an important dep for packages like Anjuta.

gnome-common-2.4.0 is now in Portage marked as ~x86.

Thanks for your report.
Comment 8 Stephane Loeuillet 2003-10-10 17:25:53 UTC
also changed the anjuta-1.1.97 ebuild to RDEPEND on it ?
or should i open a new bug-report ?

seems this DEPEND was removed when making the 1.0 => 1.1  ebuild

surely because of the version number. the one that did the 1.1 ebuild saw
it could compile anjuta without it. it's because it's a RDEPEND, not a DEPEND
Comment 9 Stephane Loeuillet 2003-10-10 17:49:00 UTC
forget this last point about anjuta missing RDEPEND : i filled a separate
bug report : #30879
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30879
Comment 10 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-11 02:50:59 UTC
but none of these packages needs this version per-se, that is my point. The
old version will do just fine.

Can't people just drop a case for a while instead of starting to post an
insane amount of comments on a trivial matter.