Bug 303057 – please stabilize =media-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-02-01 04:51:33 UTC]

This was just a bugfix release. Thanks.

Keywords: liberation-fonts-1.03: alpha amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 
Keywords: liberation-fonts-1.04: ~alpha ~amd64 ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 ~x86-fbsd

[Comment 1 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-02-02 21:58:46 UTC]

Low risk, adding arches now. :)

[Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-02-02 22:14:11 UTC]

Can we agree on maintainer stabilisation on font packages?  Or does anyone have a real blocker why we should not do it?

[Comment 3 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-02-02 22:39:57 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> Can we agree on maintainer stabilisation on font packages?  Or does anyone have
> a real blocker why we should not do it?
> 

I'm not the maintainer, sorry if I didn't follow some protocol. IMO, fonts are basically a "noarch" package so if it passes QA for one arch, I would add it to all. :)

[Comment 4 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) 2010-02-03 07:35:44 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm not the maintainer, sorry if I didn't follow some protocol. IMO, fonts are
> basically a "noarch" package so if it passes QA for one arch, I would add it to
> all. :)

Until we fail to find consensus for this issue on -dev general approach should be followed. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1#doc_chap4

That said, I don't see any problems with stabilization of this package but since in this case we have dedicated maintainer I wanted to hear him first and that's why I did not CC archs myself.

[Comment 5 Jeffrey Gardner (RETIRED) 2010-02-03 15:35:58 UTC]

Done, thanks!