Hi, this is going to be a really sloppy bug report, sorry. :) Just notice that that dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2009 doesn't compile against dev-tex/luatex-0.50. Problem solved by downgrading dev-tex/luatex-0.47.0. I guess there should be a "<="-dependecy then. Cheers, Nico Reproducible: Always
I can *not* confirm this: I just upgraded three x86 and one amd64 systems from stable tex-packages to texlive-2009 (and the required ~ARCH dependencies): Everything went smoothly. Just for the records: The order of updates was in all cases the same: poppler-*-0.12.1 (except poppler-qt4-0.12.1) xpdf-3.0.2-r4 poppler-qt4-0.12.1 texlive-core-2009 [then manually stopping and running etc-update just to be sure...] texlive-documentation-base-2009 luatex-0.50.0 texlive-documentation-*-2009 texlive-basic-2009 ...other texlive stuff... xdvik and some other stuff shown by revdep-rebuild In particular, texlive-base-2009 was built *after* luatex-0.50.0 without problems.
Well, I guess that was a nasty dependency problem with poppler. E.g., app-text/texlive itself tries to pull in =dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7 =app-text/poppler-utils-0.10.7 where as luatex I think forces a larger version number.
Gah, figured it out. The problem were some masked virtual/poppler-* packages, while the corresponding dev-libs/poppler-* were already unmasked. Closing as invalid.
