Bug 300838 – [bump] app-arch/p7zip-9.04 beta

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Iskren Slavov 2010-01-13 14:13:14 UTC]

I'll be attaching the updated ebuild for p7zip 9.04 beta. Tested on amd64 and x86.



Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
No steps to reproduce. New ebuild.

Actual Results:  
A new version of p7zip is installed.


- The hardlink patch is no longer needed because the make file in the new version is already fixed by the maintainer.
- I recreated the makefile patch for the new version to work.

[Comment 1 Iskren Slavov 2010-01-13 14:14:30 UTC]

Created attachment 216351 [details]
The new ebuild for p7zip 9.04 beta

Almost nothing is changed, just removed the hardlink patch.

[Comment 2 Iskren Slavov 2010-01-13 14:15:03 UTC]

Created attachment 216352 [details, diff]
makefile patch for p7zip 9.04

[Comment 3 Iskren Slavov 2010-01-13 14:16:09 UTC]

I hope this would be helpful and soon we'll see the new ebuild in ~unstable :)

[Comment 4 Rebecca Menessec 2010-01-31 15:50:21 UTC]

Compiles fine on x86 with marginally sane CXXFLAGS (-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=core2 -pipe -findirect-inlining -ftree-switch-conversion -mssse3 -mcx16 -mfpmath=sse) and recent gcc (gcc (Gentoo 4.4.2 p1.0) 4.4.2) and passes tests and benching from the commandline.  Can't test the wxWidgets bits right now.

Second for getting this in tree ASAP.

[Comment 5 Hanno Böck 2010-02-01 23:56:53 UTC]

Created attachment 218120 [details]
9.04-makefile.patch

Apparently, your makefile-patch doesn't work as it has no path in it. See attached one, this should work.

[Comment 6 Rebecca Menessec 2010-02-02 00:24:09 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=218120) [details]
> 9.04-makefile.patch
> 
> Apparently, your makefile-patch doesn't work as it has no path in it. See
> attached one, this should work.
> 

Both the ebuild and the patch worked out-of-the-box for me.  ~x86-- I can post emerge --info if that would be useful for determining why my server is magical...

[Comment 7 Daniel Pielmeier 2010-02-14 19:46:24 UTC]

*** Bug 276613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 8 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2010-02-15 21:34:06 UTC]

Thanks for reporting and patches.