This should go stable in order to kill the Qt3 version from tree.
(In reply to comment #0) > This should go stable in order to kill the Qt3 version from tree. Not really, as 1.4.1 had both Qt3 and Qt4 support. So I just removed the Qt3 support.
file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/SoQt/SoQt-1.4.1.ebuild?rev=1.7&view=markup plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/SoQt/SoQt-1.4.1.ebuild?rev=1.7&content-type=text/plain diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/SoQt/SoQt-1.4.1.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 Closing as LATER since yngwin fixed 1.4.1.
(In reply to comment #2) > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/SoQt/SoQt-1.4.1.ebuild?rev=1.7&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/SoQt/SoQt-1.4.1.ebuild?rev=1.7&content-type=text/plain > diff : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-libs/SoQt/SoQt-1.4.1.ebuild?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 > > Closing as LATER since yngwin fixed 1.4.1. > Hello, I think that this is a good solution because there are a few Coin problems which will affect the soqt-alpha build. But one thing I don't understand. I thought that the maintainer must solve all problems. But another time another developer has made a solution. What's then the meaning of a maintainer if everyone can made a solution for a problem. Roelof
Yngwin is the maintainer of x11-libs/qt*, so he's naturally responsible (partly) for switching the package from Qt3 to Qt4.
(In reply to comment #4) > Yngwin is the maintainer of x11-libs/qt*, so he's naturally responsible > (partly) for switching the package from Qt3 to Qt4. > Oke, No problem. Roelof