Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 29512 - Multiple Network Configuration Instructions Incorrect
Summary: Multiple Network Configuration Instructions Incorrect
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: [OLD] Docs-user
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Gentoo Linux x86 Installation Guide (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 31008 35993 38581 41989 43401 47399 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-24 06:59 UTC by Matt Seibert
Modified: 2004-04-09 23:46 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matt Seibert 2003-09-24 06:59:20 UTC
In the installation guide, section 21.3 reads as follows
   # cd /etc/init.d
   # ln -s net.eth0 net.ethx
   Only for non-PCMCIA network cards:
   # rc-update add net.ethx default

However, doing this (on my Athlon-XP machine) over the weekend produced a boot-
time error message that repeated twice saying
   net.eth0 already started

If I change the above to be the following
    # cd /etc/init.d
    # cp net.eth0 net.ethx
    Only for non-PCMCIA network cards:
    # rc-update add net.ethx default

I now get all three of my interfaces and no boot time errors or warnings about 
multiple net.eth0 starts.

I beleive that this documentation is, therefor, invalid, OR the rc-update 
proecessor is (instead of looking at the argumnet you pass it) resolving BACK 
through links to the original filename and storing that which is NOT what (I 
beleive) you are looking for
Comment 1 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-24 07:43:14 UTC
mcummings, any idea why this is?
Comment 2 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-24 09:30:24 UTC
If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that it is looking at the actual file (following the symlink chain and reading the filename from the "real" file) - but I'm no expert on the runscript.sh 

Swift - just out of curiosity, why are you pinging me on this?
Comment 3 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-25 08:42:09 UTC
Aren't you in charge of baselayout?
Comment 4 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-18 11:46:54 UTC
My error, azarah is the baselayout victim :) Azarah, can you take a look
at this? 
Comment 5 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-18 12:50:58 UTC
*** Bug 31008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-31 13:53:37 UTC
Dunno, seems fine over here.  Guess the obvious question is what version
of baselayout are being used ?

---
nosferatu init.d # ln -s net.eth0 net.eth1
nosferatu init.d # /etc/init.d/net.eth1 start
 * Please make sure that /etc/conf.d/net has $iface_eth1 set
nosferatu init.d # ./net.eth1 start
 * Please make sure that /etc/conf.d/net has $iface_eth1 set
nosferatu init.d # ls -l net.eth?
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root         4966 Oct 26 18:09 net.eth0
lrwxr-xr-x    1 root     root            8 Oct 31 23:52 net.eth1 -> net.eth0
nosferatu init.d #
Comment 7 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-11-01 06:57:53 UTC
Okay, I'll mark this as WORKSFORME.
Comment 8 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-11-01 07:59:31 UTC
Don't if its not.  I am not saying it is, and yes, the change to fix it
was recent, so if it dont, please let me know.
Comment 9 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-11-01 08:58:42 UTC
Well I have had succes stories on #gentoo on this, and it works on my PCs
personally, but I didn't know because this was pure luck or a real intention
:)
Comment 10 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-12-17 08:17:16 UTC
*** Bug 35993 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-01-18 02:14:58 UTC
*** Bug 38581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-02-17 19:56:56 UTC
*** Bug 41989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-03-01 11:49:14 UTC
*** Bug 43401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2004-04-09 23:46:56 UTC
*** Bug 47399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***