Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 29338 - Lots of 'Generating cache entry' using portage-2.0.49-r5
Summary: Lots of 'Generating cache entry' using portage-2.0.49-r5
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unclassified (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.ph...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 36022 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-22 08:55 UTC by chris strom
Modified: 2011-10-30 22:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
portage Patch (portage.patch,797 bytes, patch)
2003-09-22 11:25 UTC, chris strom
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description chris strom 2003-09-22 08:55:41 UTC
After upgrading from portage-2.0.49-r4 to portage-2.0.49-r5 this morning, I'm
getting lots of warnings such as the following:

Generating cache entry(0) for:
/usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/xfree-4.1.0-r6.ebuil|Generating cache entry(0) for:
/usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/xfree-4.3.99.11.ebuild
Generating cache entry(2) for:
/usr/portage/x11-base/xfree/xfree-4.3.99.11.ebuild                             
                                               

These warnings seem to occur when doing just about anything with emerge (sync,
-S, install).

The changelog for r5 indicates `Cache fixes and useful output added.'  I find
this output annoying rather than useful.  If these warning are here to stay,
could there at least be a switch to suppress them?
Comment 1 chris strom 2003-09-22 11:25:44 UTC
Created attachment 18139 [details, diff]
portage Patch

Per the referenced forum thread, here is the patch for portage-2.0.49-r5 that
solved the problem for me and other users in the thread.
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-09-22 14:32:51 UTC
r5 is a debugging version
Comment 3 chris strom 2003-09-22 17:16:23 UTC
I guess that's a good reason for the debug messages ;)  Still, if it's a debugging version, shouldn't it be hard masked?  

Ultimately, I suppose that I can live with it as part of being on the bleeding edge that is ~x86...
Comment 4 Jason A. Mobarak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-22 17:28:17 UTC
The ebuild for portage .49-r5 has these keywords                                
                                                                                
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~mips ~ppc ~sparc ~x86 ia64"                 
                                                                                
So yes, it is masked, but not hard masked.
Comment 5 Jason Wever (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-22 19:07:00 UTC
Can we get this masked or a new version out that doesn't have this?
Comment 6 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-09-23 21:24:34 UTC
use 2.0.49-r6 :p
Comment 7 Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-18 05:32:42 UTC
*** Bug 36022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***