Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 291941 - The md5sum of portage-latest.tar.bz2 differs from portage-latest.tar.bz2.md5sum.
Summary: The md5sum of portage-latest.tar.bz2 differs from portage-latest.tar.bz2.md5sum.
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Release Media
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Infrastructure
URL: http://de-mirror.org/distro/gentoo/sn...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-11-05 07:11 UTC by Olaf Dreyer
Modified: 2009-11-18 06:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Olaf Dreyer 2009-11-05 07:11:37 UTC 
Due to some problems with our web-proxy, I'm not able to use rsync and web-rsync.
So I wrote a script, which downloads portage-latest.tar.bz2 and portage-latest.tar.bz2.md5sum and checks the integrity of the file. After that, it's replacing the portage tree and so on ...
That works like a charm. But since a few days, the md5sum and the content of the md5sum-file are different.

Looking at the directory shows the problem: The md5sum-file is 1 day too old.
If I use the portage-YYYYMMDD.tar.bz2* files, it's all ok.

The same effect happens on different mirrors.

Greetings

Olaf


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Andrew Gaffney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-11-07 21:15:06 UTC 
The portage snapshots are handled by infra
Comment 2 Olaf Dreyer 2009-11-16 06:02:22 UTC 
Today, the md5sum was ok. Has somebody fix the bug?
Comment 3 Olaf Dreyer 2009-11-18 06:49:52 UTC 
In the last days, the problem is gone...