Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 289224 - libsigc++ 2.0*, no longer present in portage
Summary: libsigc++ 2.0*, no longer present in portage
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-15 17:39 UTC by J M W
Modified: 2009-10-17 09:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description J M W 2009-10-15 17:39:11 UTC
While working on fampp2-6.0.ebuild in my own overlay due to the breakage in fampp2 in this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216271, and trying to create an ebuild for famp2-6.0 that compiles against sigc++ 1.2, I? got this  error while the build was in the configure stage:

 checking for LOKI... yes
checking for SIGC... no

latest version of sigc++-1.2 required. (2.0.0 or better) 

this should be on the freshrpms.net website
configure: error: Fatal Error: no correct sigc++-1.2 found.

!!! Please attach the following file when seeking support:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/fampp2-6.0.0/work/fampp2-6.0.0/config.log

So it looks like the author of fampp2 believes that sigc++-2.0* is in the l.2 branch. If this is true then we should definitely still have this in the tree, since we have 1.2.7. If this is not true then we might still want it, if fampp-6.0 needs it to compile and it doesn't conflict with sigc++-2.2*.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-16 09:38:49 UTC
Please attach config.log and build.log
Comment 2 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-17 09:27:20 UTC
Yes, everything 2.0 was fixed to support 2.2 and 2.0 was removed in purpose because they are not slottable.