Since there are numerous outstanding bugs against icc-11+ (246516, 282095, 282146, 284212), we might as well bump 10.1 to 10.1.025. Just rename the ebuild and change PID to PID=1569.
What? Why not? You certainly have not been able to provide a working icc-11 ebuild. So provide an updates 10.1 ebuild! Especially when it's a rename and a 1-line update.
Hi, I've bumped icc to 11.0.56 which should fix a number of the mentioned bugs. Just wondering how many users would use 10.1.025. If we had it slotted, I would not mind.
Reporter, I suggest that you reconsider your tone. You're welcome to attach an ebuild to this bug, I can commit it in the science overlay if you wish.
Created attachment 206398 [details] icc-10.1.025 ebuild (In reply to comment #3) > Reporter, I suggest that you reconsider your tone. Then I suggest that you not mark valid bugs as WONTFIX without even a mention as to why. This is just not the right way to treat people who take the time to file bugs. > You're welcome to attach an ebuild to this bug, I can commit it in the science > overlay if you wish. Attached. You'll do just as well to add it to the main tree.. > I've bumped icc to 11.0.56 which should fix a number of the mentioned bugs. > Just wondering how many users would use 10.1.025. If we had it slotted, I > would not mind. I'll open a bug for this as well.
In science overlay