Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 283328 - www-plugins/adobe-flash-10.0.32.18 has USE=64bit on x86 (by default even)
Summary: www-plugins/adobe-flash-10.0.32.18 has USE=64bit on x86 (by default even)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-31 12:55 UTC by Steffen Schaumburg
Modified: 2010-03-16 12:53 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Steffen Schaumburg 2009-08-31 12:55:00 UTC
Summary kinda says it, just noticed on my laptop that on updating adobe-flash it would install the 64bit plugin. Since x86 is 32bit only that doesn't seem to make much sense and the flag should be masked.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Gef 2009-08-31 13:12:05 UTC
No it won't, you can check by reading the ebuild, or the CONTENTS-file of the merged package. 32bit/64bit USE-flags are only relevant for amd64 systems, and actually won't even be checked on a x86 system.
Comment 2 Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2009-09-05 09:30:28 UTC
User confusion error detected ;)
Comment 3 Steffen Schaumburg 2009-09-06 16:25:10 UTC
Ah ok, in that case could the USE flag be masked on x86 just to avoid the user confusion error? ;)
Comment 4 Jan Kundrát (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 22:45:53 UTC
.
Comment 5 Jan Kundrát (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-02 22:47:27 UTC
Comment #3 is right, if the USE flag does not make sense on a particular architecture, then one should mask it there.

Reopening and sending to the maintainers.
Comment 6 Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-02-04 22:26:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Comment #3 is right, if the USE flag does not make sense on a particular
> architecture, then one should mask it there.
> 
> Reopening and sending to the maintainers.

I agree completely, these should be masked on x86, and I"ll do this at my earliest opportunity... Though it may be a while since Real Life gets in the way.

Jan (or any other Gentoo dev), please feel free to go ahead and do this for me if you feel like it!
Comment 7 Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-16 12:53:08 UTC
Okay, should be good to go, USE="32bit 63bit" are both masked for this package under x86, just like multilib is.