I cannot believe this package was marked stable. It needs something like this: Index: rdist-6.1.5-r2.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/rdist/rdist-6.1.5-r2.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 rdist-6.1.5-r2.ebuild --- rdist-6.1.5-r2.ebuild 24 Jan 2008 14:21:54 -0000 1.2 +++ rdist-6.1.5-r2.ebuild 23 Aug 2009 01:27:56 -0000 @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-misc/rdist/rdist-6.1.5-r2.ebuild,v 1.2 2008/01/24 14:21:54 armin76 Exp $ +inherit eutils + DESCRIPTION="Remote software distribution system" HOMEPAGE="http://www.magnicomp.com/rdist/rdist.shtml" SRC_URI="http://www.magnicomp.com/download/rdist/${P}.tar.gz" @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ sed -i -e '/^%type/ s/,//g' -e 's/= {/{/g' src/gram.y || die "fixup of gram.y failed" # use mkstemp(3) instead of mktemp(3) - epatch "${FILESDIR}/rdist_mkstemp.patch" + epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-mkstemp.patch" } src_compile() { Yes, I could commit that myself...But, I ask myself, "Why?" QA Team, please remove this package since it has no maintainer or repoman --force this fix. I don't want to be involved, tbh.
(In reply to comment #0) > QA Team, please remove this package since it has no maintainer or repoman > --force this fix. I don't want to be involved, tbh. repoman --force a revbump that is.
A month without comment. Treecleaners will remove this cruft.
# Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> (5 Oct 2009) # QA standards are seriously missing on this package. It was marked stable # without applying a patch, even. No maintainer, remove in 60 days. bug 282388 net-misc/rdist
Removed from the tree
