Russian translations are way too old and while our community looks for solution to cope with translation google presents old and unmaintained translations to our users. Is it possible to add: Disallow: /doc/ru into robots.txt? Thanks in advance.
I dunno if this is even what's wanted. Still, it's not something the GDP can fix, so it should be assigned to infra, as they have the robots.txt access. Also, I think it's better to either unlink the Russian index, or else keep the translations up as proof that we need actual contributors to the documentation, to bring it up to date. Covering up the lack of attention doesn't solve anything, it merely . . . covers it up.
True. Let's unlink it too. But ... people will still find it in google and I'd like to avoid that.
Removed link from index.xml. Was already commented out from handbook index. We don't have the habit of hiding things. Outdated translations are marked as such with a link to the original.
Xavier, but is it possible to create obsoletetranslation attribute? I don't think it's good idea to put obsolete attribute in translations since document itself is not obsolete and it'll be great if there will be link on English original in the text itself. Thanks.
Has nothing to do with infra.
Beats me if this can be done. Xavier's not around to whip up the XML/XSL regardless of whether or not this is a good iea, so there's nothing the rest of us can do.
Problem not solved. People are still trying to install gentoo with 2006 year handbook! I'm tired to say every day don't use it. This is standart google query http://www.google.com.by/search?q=gentoo+handbook+ru . There is no ru-translators for ~4 years.
Kostya, please, provide patch to all documentation that will add deprecation notice to the top. Since we don't have such tag it's possible to do that manually. I'll commit such change.
(In reply to comment #8) > Kostya, please, provide patch to all documentation that will add deprecation > notice to the top. Since we don't have such tag it's possible to do that > manually. I'll commit such change. > No need . . .you need to re-sync your CVS tree and look at the documents online. I already did the handbooks earlier today. I don't plan on putting those notices on all the rest of the Russian docs; I only did the handbooks.
(In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Kostya, please, provide patch to all documentation that will add deprecation > > notice to the top. Since we don't have such tag it's possible to do that > > manually. I'll commit such change. > > > > No need . . .you need to re-sync your CVS tree and look at the documents > online. I already did the handbooks earlier today. Thank you! > I don't plan on putting those notices on all the rest of the Russian docs; I > only did the handbooks. Still I think it useful to have similar marking in other documentation too. Do we have such? If not probably some manually edited textual block could be useful.
