273697 – dev-util/ctags-5.7-r1 does not parse fortran95+ files correctly

Bug 273697 - dev-util/ctags-5.7-r1 does not parse fortran95+ files correctly

Summary: dev-util/ctags-5.7-r1 does not parse fortran95+ files correctly

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High minor (vote)
Assignee:	Vim Maintainers

URL:	http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index....
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2009-06-11 09:48 UTC by Christoph Junghans (RETIRED)
Modified:	2009-10-24 10:25 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
allow pointer assignment ("=>" operator) from fortran 95 (ctags-5.7-f95-pointers.patch,695 bytes, patch) 2009-06-11 09:49 UTC, Christoph Junghans (RETIRED)	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-06-11 09:48:26 UTC

ctags-5.7 do not handle the pointer assignment of fortan 95+ pointer correctly.

pointer1=>pointer2
or
pointer=>null()

Comment 1 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-06-11 09:49:58 UTC

Created attachment 194225 [details, diff]
allow pointer assignment ("=>" operator) from fortran 95

See bug url

Comment 2 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-10-15 19:15:17 UTC

ping@vim: This bug is here for more than 4 months

Comment 3 Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-10-24 02:04:21 UTC

Squeaky wheel, now greased.

dev-util/ctags-5.7-r2

Now, will this patch apply against the upcoming ctags-5.8...?

Comment 4 Christoph Junghans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-10-24 10:25:09 UTC

This is not fixed in ctags-5.8, but the patch can unchanged be applied in the new src as well.