Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 27008 - Class::Accessor perl module
Summary: Class::Accessor perl module
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-20 13:39 UTC by Shaun Guth
Modified: 2003-08-23 14:11 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Class-Accessor-0.18.ebuild (Class-Accessor-0.18.ebuild,410 bytes, text/plain)
2003-08-20 13:43 UTC, Shaun Guth
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Shaun Guth 2003-08-20 13:39:16 UTC
Class::Accessor module automagically generates accessor/mutators for your perl
class.  Huzzah!
Comment 1 Shaun Guth 2003-08-20 13:43:19 UTC
Created attachment 16384 [details]
Class-Accessor-0.18.ebuild

Attached ebuild  - thanks :)
Comment 2 Michael Cummings (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-22 03:45:10 UTC
Shaun,

  Does this module add support for any existing or proposed ebuilds? Gentoo policy at this time is not to add perl modules unless they are a dependancy of another package - otherwise we recommend installing yourself from CPAN.
Comment 3 Shaun Guth 2003-08-22 14:11:06 UTC
I'll be uploading a new version of splat in the near future that can be modified to rely on this (if that's what it takes to get it accepted)... but there's nothing in portage that I know of currently that requires it..

Furthermore, in discussion with rac on #gentoo (and IRL at linuxworld), he mentioned that it was better policy to start letting portage handle all perl modules (as opposed to installing manually with CPAN).  After a debate about the pros and cons, I've now moved my production systems to this method.  I am writing ebuilds for those modules which I find I need, and this is one of them.

Where are the policies located?  Or who can I talk to about changing them?
Comment 4 Robert Coie (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-23 11:00:50 UTC
Here comes a statement of the policy, and you have the attention of the the two 
people you should talk to to affect it.

At some point in the (hopefully not-to-distant) future, you will be able to type
"emerge Perl::Module" (or Perl-Module, or something to that effect) and everything
will work as you would hope, with no need for anybody to write or maintain ebuilds.

Those ebuilds will almost certainly not live in dev-perl, because no automated
system will work for 100% of the modules in CPAN.  Some of them simply have weird
build systems or dependencies on external libraries outside the Perl universe.
We will need a safety valve, so actual ebuilds in dev-perl must take priority
over those generated or simulated by any automated tool.

At that point, we would like to minimize the number of ebuilds in dev-perl that
would be adequately served by the automated portage <-> CPAN integration.  If
an ebuild is already in there, it will have to be either maintained or moved, 
neither of which is particularly appetizing.

To this end, there is a stopgap tool called g-cpan.pl that is currently in the
portage package.  It is invoked by "g-cpan.pl Module::Name".  If:

(a) g-cpan.pl installs a particular module correctly
(b) it depends on nothing outside of dev-perl
(c) nothing outside of dev-perl depends on it

...we would like to avoid adding an ebuild for it.  The final Portage <-> CPAN
integration will handle correctly everything that g-cpan.pl handles correctly.

If any of the above conditions is not met, we'll take the ebuild.

Hope both the statement of policy and the rationale behind it is clear enough.
Comment 5 Shaun Guth 2003-08-23 14:11:52 UTC
> Hope both the statement of policy and the rationale behind it is clear enough.

Thanks for the detailed post rac!  I am much more aggreable to the notion now that I know the motivation.  Consider this bug closed - thanks :)