Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 268405 - mail-client/balsa-2.3.28 stabilization request
Summary: mail-client/balsa-2.3.28 stabilization request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-05-03 10:55 UTC by Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED)
Modified: 2009-05-20 16:54 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-03 10:55:47 UTC
Hi arches, mail-client/balsa-2.3.28 has been in tree since 31 Jan 2009.

Please do your magic, target keywords are:  alpha amd64 ppc sparc x86

Thanks in advance
Comment 1 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2009-05-03 19:11:17 UTC
Making check in doc
make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/balsa-2.3.28/work/balsa-2.3.28/doc'
xmllint --noout --noent --path C:./C --xinclude --postvalid ./C/balsa.xml
xmllint --noout --noent --path de:./de --xinclude --postvalid ./de/balsa.xml
./de/balsa.xml:92: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./de/balsa.xml does not validate
make[1]: *** [check-doc-docs] Error 3
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/mail-client/balsa-2.3.28/work/balsa-2.3.28/doc'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
 * 
 * ERROR: mail-client/balsa-2.3.28 failed.
 * Call stack:
 *               ebuild.sh, line   48:  Called src_test
 *             environment, line 1371:  Called _eapi0_src_test
 *               ebuild.sh, line  598:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *                      hasq test $FEATURES && die "Make check failed. See above for details."
 *  The die message:
 *   Make check failed. See above for details.

no comment... :P
or could my chroot's be broken?
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-06 13:31:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)

> or could my chroot's be broken?

 Some upstreams don't care about the whole test suite.
Comment 3 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-06 13:49:21 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 4 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-07 20:40:03 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-09 16:08:18 UTC
sparc stable
Comment 6 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2009-05-15 20:34:33 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 7 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-20 16:54:06 UTC
ppc stable. closing since we're last