Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 26837 - ksms-0.1.2.1 (new package)
Summary: ksms-0.1.2.1 (new package)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo KDE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-17 19:45 UTC by Rafal Rzepecki
Modified: 2003-08-28 06:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ksms-0.1.2.1.ebuild (ksms-0.1.2.1.ebuild,542 bytes, text/plain)
2003-08-17 19:47 UTC, Rafal Rzepecki
Details
ksms-0.1.2.1-empty-store.diff (ksms-0.1.2.1-empty-store.diff,1.12 KB, patch)
2003-08-17 19:48 UTC, Rafal Rzepecki
Details | Diff
ChangeLog (ChangeLog,445 bytes, text/plain)
2003-08-17 19:48 UTC, Rafal Rzepecki
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:45:24 UTC
Attached is an ebuild for ksms, a KDE sms sender/archiver. 
Also there is a little patch that fixes a problem that showed up on my box, 
namely crash with SIGFPE if local message store is nonexistant.
Comment 1 Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:47:02 UTC
Created attachment 16243 [details]
ksms-0.1.2.1.ebuild

I suggest the net-misc category.
Comment 2 Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:48:06 UTC
Created attachment 16244 [details, diff]
ksms-0.1.2.1-empty-store.diff
Comment 3 Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-17 19:48:26 UTC
Created attachment 16245 [details]
ChangeLog
Comment 4 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-27 19:23:38 UTC
In portage.  Your patch doesn't apply cleanly - can you rework it and send it again?  Thanks. 
Comment 5 Rafal Rzepecki 2003-08-28 03:50:40 UTC
Well it does apply cleanly here. What exactly is your problem with the patch? 
Also, I don't understand why didn't you use the patch mechanism involving base 
eclass and PATCHES environment variable (as I did)? And why did you deleted 
the RDEPEND variable? 
Also the first line in the ChangeLog refers to kmymoney... 
 
Reopening the bug because the patch is vital. 
Comment 6 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-28 06:18:27 UTC
You are right - on a completely different machine now the patch works...fixing. 
 
ALso, the only reason I changed the patching mechanism was to test and see if epach worked 
vs. what I couldn't get to work. 
 
But it all looks good now (I hope).