Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 265672 - syslog-ng-2.1.3.ebuild: syslog-ng forwarding to remote host; dies when remote host goes down
Summary: syslog-ng-2.1.3.ebuild: syslog-ng forwarding to remote host; dies when remote...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL: [1] http://www.syslog.org/forum/syslo...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-04-10 17:30 UTC by Michael Weissenbacher
Modified: 2009-04-10 18:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Weissenbacher 2009-04-10 17:30:01 UTC
I got bitten by this bug this week. There is a Problem in syslog-ng-2.1.3.ebuild that causes it to eat up all memory and CPU when remote logging via UDP is enabled and the remote host replies with ICMP port unreachable.  The problem is especially bad on boxes with AMD64 and lots of ram, since it can take the whole system down with it.

This has been fixed in version 2.1.4, as reported in [1]. I already unmasked 2.1.4 and installed it, which fixed the problem for me. I hope that a version bump to 2.1.4 can be done soon.

[1] http://www.syslog.org/forum/syslog-ng/syslog-ng-forwarding-to-remote-host-dies-when-remote-host-goes-down/
Comment 1 Michael Weissenbacher 2009-04-10 17:35:40 UTC
More info about this bug:
https://lists.balabit.hu/pipermail/syslog-ng/2009-March/012701.html

The split-out patch:
--- a/src/afsocket.c
+++ b/src/afsocket.c
@@ -912,6 +912,8 @@ afsocket_dd_notify(LogPipe *s, LogPipe *sender, gint notify_code, gpointer user_
     {
     case NC_CLOSE:
     case NC_WRITE_ERROR:
+      log_writer_reopen(self->writer, NULL);
+      
       msg_error("Connection broken",
                 evt_tag_int("time_reopen", self->time_reopen),
                 NULL);
Comment 2 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-04-10 18:34:14 UTC
2.1.4 is already in the tree.  If you need features from it, you should unmask it locally.
Comment 3 Michael Weissenbacher 2009-04-10 18:55:37 UTC
I already unmasked it locally, but IMHO the stable version shouldn't have such a major bug. I don't like the idea of unmasking this package on 30+ machines. Why can't 2.1.4 be pushed to stable?