Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 264649 - please stabilize sci-mathematics/wxmaxima-0.8.2 and sci-mathematics/maxima-5.18.1
Summary: please stabilize sci-mathematics/wxmaxima-0.8.2 and sci-mathematics/maxima-5...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Mathematics related packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks: built_with_use 264552
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-04-02 16:03 UTC by Marcello Magaldi
Modified: 2009-12-26 16:03 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marcello Magaldi 2009-04-02 16:03:53 UTC 
as reported in bug 264552 wxmaxima-0.7.4 doesn't compile anymore ( perhaps due to gcc-4.3.2 amd64 stabilization ) anyway wxmaxima >=0.7.5 builds fine (I tried 0.7.5 and 0.8.1) but it needs a newer sci-mathematics/maxima (>=5.15.0) 

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Vytautas 2009-05-08 14:35:24 UTC 
It do not compiles for me too on x86 on gcc 4.3.2.
So stabilize maxima 5.18.1 and wxmaxima 0.8.2 I personally unmasked them and report problems if any here.
Comment 2 Vytautas 2009-05-10 07:41:29 UTC 
maxima 5.18.1 and wxmaxima 0.8.2 works fine.
Comment 3 Richard Marko 2009-05-31 21:47:05 UTC 
maxima 5.18.1 and wxmaxima 0.8.2 works fine on amd64
Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-07-21 07:55:12 UTC 
No reaction from maintainers for some time, so I cc architectures.
Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-07-21 17:12:35 UTC 
x86 stable
Comment 6 Marcello Magaldi 2009-07-21 17:51:44 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> x86 stable
> 

Do you mean that maxima 5.18.1 and wxmaxima 0.8.2 are x86-stable or only maxima? 
I synced some minutes ago and only maxima 5.18.1 gets stabled, do you forget wxmaxima or probably the wxmaxima stabilisation wasn't propagated to my rsync mirror?
Comment 7 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-07-21 18:55:58 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > x86 stable
> > 
> 
> Do you mean that maxima 5.18.1 and wxmaxima 0.8.2 are x86-stable or only
> maxima? 
> I synced some minutes ago and only maxima 5.18.1 gets stabled, do you forget
> wxmaxima or probably the wxmaxima stabilisation wasn't propagated to my rsync
> mirror?

 Have some patience.  Syncinc must have happened between my two commits.
Comment 8 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-08-02 22:14:29 UTC 
Confusing multitude of warnings & package.mask entry blocking required RDEPEND/DEPEND, please clarify:
  RDEPEND.bad                   81
   sci-mathematics/maxima/maxima-5.14.0.ebuild: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['dev-lisp/gcl']
(list goes on longer then bugzilla wants)

AMD64 aborting stabilization attempt.
Comment 9 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2009-08-04 05:28:15 UTC 
amd64 stable
Comment 10 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-10-07 16:24:28 UTC 
ppc stable
Comment 11 linuxknow 2009-11-01 03:24:42 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> as reported in bug 264552 wxmaxima-0.7.4 doesn't compile anymore ( perhaps due
> to gcc-4.3.2 amd64 stabilization ) anyway wxmaxima >=0.7.5 builds fine (I tried
> 0.7.5 and 0.8.1) but it needs a newer sci-mathematics/maxima (>=5.15.0) 
> 
> Reproducible: Always
> 

try make.conf use x86~ and 
emerge wxmaxima
Comment 12 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-12-26 16:03:34 UTC 
sparc stable, closing