Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 259253 - Please stabilize =sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2
Summary: Please stabilize =sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on: 243216 245266
Blocks: 254616
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-02-16 18:20 UTC by Raúl Porcel (RETIRED)
Modified: 2009-08-31 15:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-02-16 18:20:34 UTC 
Needed for bug 254616
Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2009-02-16 19:00:31 UTC 
i'll need to review the open bug list to see what is/isnt a regression
Comment 2 Andrew Brouwers 2009-03-06 00:22:52 UTC 
Any update on this?  Newer udev would be great for stable, and it appears this is all that is blocking.
Comment 3 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-03-16 21:27:32 UTC 
bug #245266 is a regression from -r1. Adding to depends.
Comment 4 Matthias Schwarzott gentoo-dev 2009-03-26 14:36:55 UTC 
Btw. looking into cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2 ebuild, it just depends on >=sys-fs/udev-124, so where is written, why this blocks stabling newer udev?
Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-03-26 14:45:08 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Btw. looking into cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2 ebuild, it just depends on
> >=sys-fs/udev-124, so where is written, why this blocks stabling newer udev?
> 
Both cryptsetup 1.0.5* and =1.0.6(-r1 and -r2 are okay) block udev:
	!>=sys-fs/udev-126
Comment 6 Matthias Schwarzott gentoo-dev 2009-03-26 14:57:32 UTC 
Ah, so I did look at the wrong ebuild, my bad.

Do you expect to have the bugs blocking stabling solved in finite time?
If not, I suggest you take cryptsetup-1.0.5-r1 and the udevsettle patch, put it into cryptsetup-1.0.5-r2 and stable that.
Comment 7 Andrew Brouwers 2009-04-22 16:49:49 UTC 
*poke*  Any news?  The stable version of udev is quite aged, and this will block anything newer for ever updating.  135, which already tried to go stable, had this as the only blocker.
Comment 8 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2009-06-16 20:53:09 UTC 
bug 243216 was fixed and afaik, that is the only remaining blocker.

Keywords: cryptsetup-1.0.5-r1: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86 
Keywords: cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2: ~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~s390 ~sh ~sparc ~x86
Comment 9 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-17 12:44:23 UTC 
x86 stable
Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-17 13:23:22 UTC 
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 11 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-19 21:47:42 UTC 
ppc64 stable
Comment 12 Thomas Anderson (tanderson) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-26 18:03:26 UTC 
amd64 stable
Comment 13 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-27 09:01:08 UTC 
Both already stabilized/keyworded. Wonder why we were still on CC.
Comment 14 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-27 09:06:34 UTC 
Ah, now I get it. This bug is confusing.

Stabilized sys-fs/cryptsetup-1.0.6-r2 on alpha.
Comment 15 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-07-15 18:41:07 UTC 
ppc stable
Comment 16 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-08-31 15:04:10 UTC 
arm/ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable, closing
Comment 17 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-08-31 15:04:20 UTC 
Closing