Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 253861 - sys-fs/udev-124-r1: No memory stick rules
Summary: sys-fs/udev-124-r1: No memory stick rules
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement
Assignee: udev maintainers
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug....
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-05 14:40 UTC by Daniel Ribeiro da Silva
Modified: 2009-01-12 12:34 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
posible rules add /etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules (60-persistent-storage.rules,347 bytes, text/plain)
2009-01-05 14:50 UTC, Daniel Ribeiro da Silva
Details
the diff (60-persistent-storage.diff,1010 bytes, text/plain)
2009-01-06 14:27 UTC, Daniel Ribeiro da Silva
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Ribeiro da Silva 2009-01-05 14:40:57 UTC
I using sys-fs/udev-124-r1, but in /etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules no have rules for memory stick card.

Something like this:
KERNEL=="mspblk[0-9]", SUBSYSTEMS=="memstick", ATTRS{name}=="?*", ATTRS{serial}=="?*", ENV{ID_NAME}="$attr{name}", ENV{ID_SERIAL}="$attr{serial}", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/memstick-$env{ID_NAME}_$env{ID_SERIAL}"
KERNEL=="mspblk[0-9]p[0-9]", ENV{ID_NAME}=="?*", ENV{ID_SERIAL}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/memstick-$env{ID_NAME}_$env{ID_SERIAL}-part%n"

Thanks.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Daniel Ribeiro da Silva 2009-01-05 14:50:03 UTC
Created attachment 177470 [details]
posible rules add /etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules
Comment 2 Daniel Ribeiro da Silva 2009-01-06 14:27:12 UTC
Created attachment 177572 [details]
the diff

The diff.
Comment 3 Matthias Schwarzott gentoo-dev 2009-01-12 10:50:43 UTC
The redhat maintainer (Harald Hoyer) already submitted this to udev upstream and the rules are already contained in udev-134 and newer (especially udev-135-r3 that is a stable candidate).
Comment 4 Daniel Ribeiro da Silva 2009-01-12 12:34:55 UTC
If udev-135-r3 is a stable candidate them this bug is FIXED.

Thanks a lot (^_^)/