Bug 25118 – sys-fs/submount

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2003-07-23 06:47:08 UTC]

supermount replacement

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

[Comment 1 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2003-07-23 06:47:56 UTC]

Created attachment 14920 [details]
net-fs/submount-0.2

[Comment 2 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2003-12-04 00:11:19 UTC]

Created attachment 21675 [details]
sys-fs/submount-0.5

move net-fs/submount sys-fs/submount

Version bumped

[Comment 3 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) 2003-12-28 15:28:12 UTC]

Could you please make a "submount-2.4-0.6" and a "submount-2.6-0.6" as the two versions seem to have forked for the two different kernels.

[Comment 4 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-01-28 02:47:07 UTC]

I don't understend reason for this.
Ebuld itself find needed version (like a different SLOT)

[Comment 5 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-01-28 03:13:00 UTC]

Created attachment 24526 [details]
sys-fs/submount-0.7

[Comment 6 Jason Cox (RETIRED) 2004-03-29 12:55:11 UTC]

Is anything happening with this one? I'd hate to bring on the evils of supermount/submount speech that we've all heard so many times. Doesn't Submount need a patched kernel as well? As far as I can tell, there are no kernels in the portage tree that are submount ready (if it needs a patched kernel, of course). If it does need a patched kernel, will that conflict with Supermount in any way?

[Comment 7 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-03-31 21:31:25 UTC]

Submount doesn't need a patched kernel.
Submount don't conflict with Supermount.

[Comment 8 Jason Cox (RETIRED) 2004-04-08 19:14:56 UTC]

I just tried to compile this on a 2.6 kernel and got nowhere. If you redid the ebuild and updated it to submount-0.9 I'll add it to the portage tree.

[Comment 9 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-04-09 06:24:16 UTC]

Created attachment 28946 [details]
sys-fs/submount-0.9

Done

[Comment 10 Jason Cox (RETIRED) 2004-04-09 06:52:15 UTC]

It fails to compile here still. 

make -C /lib/modules/2.6.5-gentoo1/build SUBDIRS=/var/tmp/portage/submount-0.9/work/submount-0.9/subfs-0.9 modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-gentoo1'
Makefile:421: /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-gentoo1/arch/x86/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-gentoo1/arch/x86/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.5-gentoo1'
make: *** [default] Error 2

[Comment 11 Felix Kurth 2004-04-11 13:23:47 UTC]

Created attachment 29110 [details, diff]
patch to solve the compile error

Short hack to solve the compile.

[Comment 12 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-04-12 05:35:41 UTC]

Created attachment 29134 [details]
sys-fs/submount-0.9

Thanx.
Fixed.

[Comment 13 Jason Cox (RETIRED) 2004-04-13 19:54:35 UTC]

I'd love to see this get in, but now I'm getting sandbox violations.

ACCESS DENIED  open_wr:   /usr/src/linux-2.6.5-love4/include/linux/version.h.tmp

Also, is it possible to redo the ebuild using the kernel-2 eclass? I think that might fix up a lot of issues.

[Comment 14 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-04-15 01:28:26 UTC]

See Bug 32737.
I think about workaround.
Try FEATURES="-sandbox -usersandbox"

[Comment 15 Ahmed Farid 2004-04-15 23:27:47 UTC]

Created attachment 29398 [details]
a modified ebuild with kmod.eclass support.

kernel modules should use kmod.eclass not kernel-2.eclass.

[Comment 16 Dmitry S. Kulyabov 2004-04-16 05:20:40 UTC]

Created attachment 29417 [details]
sys-fs/submount-0.9 with koutput

Thanx.
I agree. 
koutput is a new style of kernel building.
I switch from kernel-mod.eclass to kmod.eclass.
Try.

[Comment 17 Jason Cox (RETIRED) 2004-04-16 07:47:58 UTC]

Added to the tree. Thans for your hard work everyone.