<snip> Delivered-To: spooky85@gmail.com Received: by 10.150.219.21 with SMTP id r21cs2708ybg; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.241.10 with SMTP id o10mr5771602wfh.112.1228374198418; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:03:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <amd64@gentoo.org> Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 28si1135551wfd.14.2008.12.03.23.03.13; Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:03:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amd64@gentoo.org designates 140.211.166.183 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.211.166.183; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amd64@gentoo.org designates 140.211.166.183 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amd64@gentoo.org Received: by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) id 20BF664A10; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: amd64@gentoo.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5534664804 for <amd64@gentoo.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:03:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 24.465 X-Spam-Level: ************************ X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=24.465 required=5.5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DCC_CHECK=2.17, DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=2.041, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FU+uNskdCwwI for <amd64@gentoo.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 85-250-127-222.bb.netvision.net.il (85-250-127-222.bb.netvision.net.il [85.250.127.222]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAFCF647C9 for <amd64@gentoo.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:03:08 +0000 (UTC) To: <amd64@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: Order status From: <amd64@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Importance: High Content-Type: text/html Message-Id: <20081204070308.AAFCF647C9@smtp.gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:03:08 +0000 (UTC) spam... </snip> i think postfix should check the sender address if it contains local domains/addresses and drop the connection if the sender isn't authenticated.
No. Because that would require every developer and alias to be forcibly relayed via mail.gentoo.org, which is not an option for many people behind firewalls. Our new mail stuff, when I get around to it, will be blocking more of the spam when it's inbound at g.o, before passing it on.