Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 248960 - [QA] app-misc/workrave: big file in $FILESDIR
Summary: [QA] app-misc/workrave: big file in $FILESDIR
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-11-26 20:48 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified: 2008-11-27 10:51 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-26 20:48:44 UTC
(29K) app-misc/workrave/files/workrave-1.8.5-libsigc++-2.2.2.patch

I'm reporting this bug since repoman issued a warning about a file bigger than 20KiB.

Big files should be moved to mirrors, or otherwise stored outside the main cvs tree, since the cvs/rsync tree is downloaded by all users, whether they'll use your package or not.

Thank you,
Diego
Comment 1 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-26 23:51:34 UTC
I don't touch otherwise working package for repoman _warnings_. 1.8.5 will die as soon as possible anyway because 1.9.0 has plenty of fixes codewise. Did that limit changed recently btw, I thought it was 30KB.

Closing wontfix, if someone feels this is innapropriate please make the change yourself.
Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-27 00:17:31 UTC
No the limit has always been 20K, and IMHO this is still a bug worth to fix since it's being a burden to users but it's not really my call I guess, maybe we should promote that to error for newly added files.
Comment 3 Serkan Kaba (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-27 07:39:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> No the limit has always been 20K, and IMHO this is still a bug worth to fix
> since it's being a burden to users but it's not really my call I guess, maybe
> we should promote that to error for newly added files.
> 

Promoting this to an error is not logical. Let the humans decide what to be done in case the excess amount is not to much. (Such as 21K instead of 20K)
Comment 4 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-27 10:51:25 UTC
20K is already very big; what I meant is to make it impossible to _add_ further files, while still allowing the ones that are already in the tree until they can be taken out.