Forwarding from Karl-Heinz Zimmer who mailed this to me. I've sent him a note to submit here the next time. --- I just found something on http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/contract.xml that probably is a typo: "However, Gentoo Linux will never depend upon a piece of software unless it conforms to the GNU General Public License, GNU "Lesser" Public License or some other license approved by the Open Source Initiative (OSI.)" The license is called "GNU Lesser General Public License" (at least so it is called /today/ while originally it was called "GNU Library General Public License" until good Stallman changed his mind). see: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#LGPL So the word "General" is missing here: the trick is that this license is called lesser general - but not lesser public. <g> Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
His address is khz@kde.org - I sent him a note to make himself an account so he can be cc'd on this. Yeah, I know I went the long way around this...
I'll change this
Committed.
