I noticed some suspect text in /usr/share/doc/openldap-2.0.25-r2/rfc/rfc2252.txt.gz I compared with ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2252.txt and found some differences. I didn't check the others .. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. diff -u ~/work/tmp/rfc2252.txt-as-distributed-by-gentoo ~/work/tmp/rfc2252.txt Actual Results: There was a difference: --- /home/jean/work/tmp/rfc2252.txt-as-distributed-by-gentoo 2003-07-11 12:42:24.000000000 +0200 +++ /home/jean/work/tmp/rfc2252.txt 2003-07-11 12:44:57.000000000 +0200 @@ -1027,12 +1027,12 @@ 6.11. DIT Content Rule Description + ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.16 DESC 'DIT Content Rule Description' ) - ues in this syntax are encoded according to the following BNF. - lementors should note that future versions of this document - have expanded this BNF to include additional terms. + Values in this syntax are encoded according to the following BNF. + Implementors should note that future versions of this document may + have expanded this BNF to include additional terms. - 0 DITContentRuleDescription = "(" numericoid ; Structural ObjectClass identifier @@ -1045,9 +1045,8 @@ [ "NOT" oids ] ; AttributeType identifiers ")" - 0 2. Facsimile Telephone Number +6.12. Facsimile Telephone Number - 3 ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.22 DESC 'Facsimile Telephone Number' ) @@ -1063,6 +1062,7 @@ + Wahl, et. al. Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 2252 LADPv3 Attributes December 1997 Expected Results: Nothing
Created attachment 14370 [details, diff] Patch to /usr/share/doc/openldap-2.0.25-r2/rfc/rfc2252.txt Here's the patch as attachment too, fwiw
Created attachment 14371 [details, diff] Patch to /usr/share/doc/openldap-2.0.25-r2/rfc/rfc2252.txt Here's the patch as attachment too, fwiw
I have added a patch to the 2.0.27-r4 ebuild which fixes this. Thanks for the eagle eyes! :)
