It would be very nice to have a "free" or "nonfree" USE flag for x11-base/xorg-x11 The following sub-packages are non-free: media-fonts/font-adobe-utopia-100dpi media-fonts/font-adobe-utopia-75dpi media-fonts/font-adobe-utopia-type1 media-fonts/font-bh-100dpi media-fonts/font-bh-75dpi media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi media-fonts/font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi media-fonts/font-bh-type1 media-fonts/font-daewoo-misc media-fonts/font-dec-misc media-fonts/font-ibm-type1 media-fonts/font-jis-misc media-fonts/font-xfree86-type1
Except that X requires some of those fonts to function properly... Do you have a list of replacements? Thanks
I do not, at this time. I am in the middle of trying to get a Free JDK working, but once I am done with that I will manually unmerge these fonts and see if there are any noticable problems. If so, I may take a few hours to design really simple replacements as needed.
(In reply to comment #1) > Except that X requires some of those fonts to function properly... Do you have > a list of replacements? To my knowledge X only requires "fixed" font provided to function properly. media-fonts/font-misc-misc provides that, which isn't listed in comment #0
Confirmed: no problems with these packages removed.
We package X.Org as released by upstream, so this is more appropriately addressed to them. I know people are interested in fixing license issues because a number have been resolved in recent times. Please file upstream bugs at bugs.freedesktop.org in the xorg product. Thanks!
X.org is distributed split. How is a USE flag on a meta-package an upstream issue?
(In reply to comment #6) > X.org is distributed split. How is a USE flag on a meta-package an upstream > issue? Our meta package reflects the package set contained in an X.Org X11 release as determined by upstream X.Org developers. The suggestion in this bug is a workaround instead of getting the licenses changed (if indeed they are nonfree), which needs to happen upstream.