Bug 239232 – net-wireless/ussp-push version bump to 0.11 / usage fix

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Maik Nijhuis 2008-10-01 08:52:30 UTC]

Version 0.11 of ussp-push is available at http://www.xmailserver.org/ussp-push.html

when you're bumping the version, also please fix the usage info in the ebuild:

"ussp-push 00:11:22:33:44:55 localfile remotefile" does not work, you need to put an "@" behind the address, like this: "ussp-push 00:11:22:33:44:55@ localfile remotefile"

This 'feature' also holds for ussp-push 0.9. I had to dig into the source to find it.

Reproducible: Always




When solving this bug, you can also close http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203601

[Comment 1 Denilson Sá Maia 2009-03-05 20:24:40 UTC]

I was about to submit a bug about these wrong usage instructions. The ebuild says:
 * You can use ussp-push in three ways:
 * 1. rfcomm bind /dev/rcomm0 00:11:22:33:44:55 10
 *    ussp-push /dev/rfcomm0 localfile remotefile
 * 2. ussp-push 00:11:22:33:44:55@10 localfile remotefile
 * 3. ussp-push 00:11:22:33:44:55 localfile remotefile

But ussp-push --help shows:
Usage: ussp-push [--dev DEVID] [--timeo TIMEO] [--debug] {DEVICE, BTADDR@[BTCHAN]} LFILE RFILE

So, the '@' character is mandatory. It is also described at ussp-push homepage.

[Comment 2 Michał Górny 2009-05-15 09:30:36 UTC]

Created attachment 191331 [details, diff]
Patch to support newer bluez

[Comment 3 Michał Górny 2009-05-15 09:36:42 UTC]

Created attachment 191332 [details]
Updated ebuild

This ebuild aims to gaim compatibility with newer net-wireless/bluez. It also updates the usage.

[Comment 4 Michał Górny 2009-05-15 09:38:02 UTC]

Please add 'EBUILD' to keywords.

[Comment 5 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) 2009-10-16 20:09:21 UTC]

*** Bug 203601 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 6 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) 2009-10-16 20:31:29 UTC]

0.11 is in the tree. thanks for the report and the ebuild proposal.