Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 23901 - emerge octave stop at fsolve.c. File seems to be missing 3 instances of \n\
Summary: emerge octave stop at fsolve.c. File seems to be missing 3 instances of \n\
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal
Assignee: George Shapovalov (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-07-02 23:32 UTC by Jarek Luberek
Modified: 2003-09-09 20:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jarek Luberek 2003-07-02 23:32:29 UTC
DLD-FUNCTIONS/fsolve.cc:216:3: missing terminating " character 
DLD-FUNCTIONS/fsolve.cc:240:15: missing terminating " character 
DLD-FUNCTIONS/fsolve.cc:348:1: unterminated argument list invoking macro "DEFUN_DLD" 
 
It will compile if I add \n\ to 3 lines with the text block that begins at 216 and ends at 240. 
 
/jarek 
 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-07-21 05:23:05 UTC
using gcc 3.3?
Comment 2 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-07-21 05:24:20 UTC
btw, of which octave version are you talking at all?
Comment 3 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-05 00:00:48 UTC
Jarek? Still alive and having a problem?
Comment 4 Jarek Luberek 2003-08-05 17:20:03 UTC
Ok, sorry for being quiet for so long and for posting such a poor bug report.
Anyway, there was only one version of octave in portage, 2.1.40.
The problem could have been gcc-3.3 related, I don't know since much time has passed between now and then. Now, I've successfully compiled octave with gcc-3.2.3  which means all is OK.

/jarek
Comment 5 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-05 23:06:26 UTC
Thanks for replying... no, it doesn't mean it's ok because sooner or later gcc 3.3 will be the default compiler. Perhaps I'll find time to check this with the current version.
Comment 6 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-08-07 05:29:03 UTC
George, I vote for declaring .49 stable - it does not have this problem.
Comment 7 George Shapovalov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-09 20:22:37 UTC
Hm, strange, why did I not see this bug earlier? I guess yet another "eaten" notification by bugzilla :(

Anyway, I do not see this problem here either and 2.1.49 is in stable on x86 already. I guess I'll just close this bug then.

George