Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 237849 - Please bump dev-python/psycopg to 2.0.8
Summary: Please bump dev-python/psycopg to 2.0.8
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Python Gentoo Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-09-16 16:38 UTC by Nathan
Modified: 2008-10-15 21:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Updated version of the same patch that was applied to earlier versions of psycopg. (psycopg-2.0.8-fbsd.patch,458 bytes, patch)
2008-09-16 16:40 UTC, Nathan
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nathan 2008-09-16 16:38:32 UTC
psycopg 2.0.8 has been released with many bug fixes over 2.0.7.  A memory leak and a crasher have been fixed, and some new features have been added.

Full changelog is here:

http://initd.org/pub/software/psycopg/ChangeLog-2.0

Sources (and signature) are available here:

http://initd.org/pub/software/psycopg/psycopg2-2.0.8.tar.gz
http://initd.org/pub/software/psycopg/psycopg2-2.0.8.tar.gz.sig

The following worked for emerging 2.0.8 for me (as root):

Save psycopg-2.0.8-fbsd.patch (I will attach that file to this bug) to /usr/portage/dev-python/psycopg/files  [please note that I don't know _why_ this patch needs to be applied, but I'm just preserving the same behaviour of this patch from earlier versions]

cd /usr/portage/dev-python/psycopg
cp psycopg-2.0.7.ebuild psycopg-2.0.8.ebuild
ebuild psycopg-2.0.8.ebuild digest
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge psycopg

In my testing, everything seems to be working great.
Comment 1 Nathan 2008-09-16 16:40:27 UTC
Created attachment 165569 [details, diff]
Updated version of the same patch that was applied to earlier versions of psycopg.

I don't know exactly why this one-line patch is needed, though I presume that it has something to do with gentoo-bsd stuff.  I simply preserved the patch behaviour, as the lines had changed slightly making it so that the old patch would fail.
Comment 2 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-10-15 21:18:18 UTC
bumped in portage, thanks for the report