Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 236007 - dev-python/gnome-python-extras - allow building with xulrunner-bin
Summary: dev-python/gnome-python-extras - allow building with xulrunner-bin
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-08-28 11:05 UTC by Dominik Kozaczko
Modified: 2008-09-15 22:48 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
patch adding xulrunner(-bin) as alternative dependencies (gnome-python-extras-xulrunner-bin.patch,587 bytes, patch)
2008-08-28 11:06 UTC, Dominik Kozaczko
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dominik Kozaczko 2008-08-28 11:05:07 UTC
I added this small patch to the ebuild and now gnome-python-extras builds with xulrunner-bin. Unfortunatelu, I don't know how to test it. I emerged some packages depending on gnome-python-extras and they work ok.

It would be good to add such alternative dependency to all packages depending on xulrunner.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Dominik Kozaczko 2008-08-28 11:06:07 UTC
Created attachment 163978 [details, diff]
patch adding xulrunner(-bin) as alternative dependencies
Comment 2 Wormo (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-08-28 18:25:13 UTC
Thanks for the patch submission, assigning to maintainers
Comment 3 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-08-28 18:59:22 UTC
looks like xulrunner-bin is indeed providing needed material but this isn't going to work great as it will only provide 32 bit libs for xulrunner. This might work fine on x86 but isn't exactly a good idea on 64bit arches imho.

@armin76, what say you about the implications of such change in deps ?
Comment 4 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2008-09-01 10:53:49 UTC
I am against such a change, especially considering we want to make it use xulrunner-1.9 instead ASAP, and there is no xulrunner-bin-1.9
Comment 5 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-14 21:10:33 UTC
I'm against this because arch-specific deps are a bad thing.  xulrunner-bin won't work for any arch except x86.
Comment 6 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-15 22:48:15 UTC
ok, I think the matter is set, it's not going to happen. Thanks for submitting the idea anyway.