Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 233852 - net-dialup/hsfmodem-7.68.00.12 not usable by a user in the "dialout"group
Summary: net-dialup/hsfmodem-7.68.00.12 not usable by a user in the "dialout"group
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Dialup Developers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-08-03 22:10 UTC by Denis de La Fortelle
Modified: 2008-09-25 20:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Denis de La Fortelle 2008-08-03 22:10:05 UTC
gnome-ppp/wvdial is not anymore working by a user in the "dialout" GROUP, but usable by a user in the "uucp" GROUP (or root).

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.log in an account (root, user in uucp, user in dialout)
2.activate gnome-ppp/wvdial
3.read the journal

Actual Results:  
Gnome-ppp/wvdial can not open /dev/ttySHSF0 from a user in the "dialout" group and not in the "uucp" group.

Expected Results:  
In user session with user in dialout group, Gnome-ppp/wvdial should be able to open the /dev/ttySHSF0 device.

The hsf-rules were placed in the 00- bin (00-hsf-rules).
As the KERNEL="tty..." series is handled by now in the 50-udev-default-rules the /dev/ttySHSF0 is eventually put in the "uucp" GROUP, not the "dialout" GROUP as expected.
It should be placed in the 70- bin (driver bin) as 70-hsf-rules, after the (gentoo) 65-permissions-rules (which might interfer in the future).
70-hsf-rules verified working. To be pushed upstream ?
Comment 1 Alin Năstac (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-08-09 10:36:09 UTC
Does it work if you move the rules file to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hsf?
Comment 2 Denis de La Fortelle 2008-09-16 15:52:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Does it work if you move the rules file to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hsf?
> 
I was using 7.68.00.12 on a 2.6.26-gentoo-r1 kernel.
It appears that 7.68.00.12 has been removed from gentoo tree for an at least not advertised reason. Puzzling and full stop for me.
So, I am 56k dead, waiting for resurection, maybe for good through one of those brand new USB CDC ACM worldwide dongle.
Cheers.
Comment 3 Alin Năstac (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-21 13:29:23 UTC
Huh? 7.68.00.12 is in the tree...

My question is: if you move that udev rule file to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hsf, does it fix your problem?
Please respond in a timely manner. I will give you one week time to respond, if you don't then I will assume the answer is "yes". 
Comment 4 Denis de La Fortelle 2008-09-23 08:49:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Huh? 7.68.00.12 is in the tree...
> 
> My question is: if you move that udev rule file to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hsf,
> does it fix your problem?
> Please respond in a timely manner. I will give you one week time to respond, if
> you don't then I will assume the answer is "yes". 
> 
hsfmodem-7.68.00.12.ebuild might be in the tree for you, but I dont see it on the Gentoo Packages site (checked right now, please take a look), neither in my /usr/portage/net-dialup/hsfmodem/ after many sync even if it should be for what I read in the Changelog (30 July entry) and files (the .12 patch is here).
So, I can not answer your question, even if I think it should work.
Anyway, thanks.
Comment 5 Alin Năstac (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-23 19:59:10 UTC
oops... seems that I remove it by accident, sorry for that.
Try to sync in an hour or so, it should be there.
Comment 6 Denis de La Fortelle 2008-09-24 09:03:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> oops... seems that I remove it by accident, sorry for that.
> Try to sync in an hour or so, it should be there.
> 
synced to hsfmodem-7.68.00.12, moved udev hsf rules to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hsf.rules, works fine for me.
Thanks.
Comment 7 Alin Năstac (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-25 20:47:56 UTC
Fixed in hsfmodem-7.68.00.13.