* QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected * Please include this file in your report: * /home/sda8/tmp/portage/net-misc/netkit-telnetd-0.17-r9/temp/scanelf-ignored-LDFLAGS.log * /usr/bin/telnet * /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/telnet.debug * /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/telnetlogin.debug * /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/telnetd.debug * /usr/sbin/telnetd * /usr/sbin/telnetlogin
Created attachment 162053 [details] scanelf-ignored-LDFLAGS.log
Thank you for report Mart, fixed in netkit-telnetd-0.17-r10. CC'ing solar as he did all maintainance, so might be interested in this change. BTW, solar, I did some changes for this package in my overlay, so what do you think about following: 1. Change versioning to state explicitly debian patchlevel. so instead of 0.17 use 0.17_p36? 2. Rename this package to netkit-telnet and add server USE flag. Having telnetd package with -server USE flag installed have no sense as it strage to install server without server :) server USE flag in this case is rather useful as it's possible then to add virtual/inted dependency, which is absent and has no sense if we need only client. Also blocker for this USE flag - USE deps - already very near to the state to be removed. What do you think?
I don't think using _pXX is really fitting. As for (+|-) server it does not support that today and renaming stuff just causes problems. I always want to avoid pkg re-renames Vs (+|-)server to mean inted why not just roll with a local USE= flag for it? inted? ( virtial/inetd )
(In reply to comment #3) > Vs (+|-)server to mean inted why not just roll with a local USE= flag for it? > inted? ( virtial/inetd ) inetd is not very clear for me. May be client or client-only (which already is used in the tree)?
