Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 23290 - baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1 unmasked by accident?
Summary: baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1 unmasked by accident?
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-22 14:50 UTC by Rob Cakebread (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-06-22 15:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rob Cakebread (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 14:50:56 UTC 
The ChangeLog says it was unmasked for ~sparc, but looking at the ebuild I see
x86   unmasked also. Was this by mistake or was ChangeLog wrong? There are an
awful lot of people on the forums reporting problems.

*baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1

  22 Jun 2003; Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1.ebuild:
  Changed ~sparc to sparc in KEYWORDS
Comment 1 Rob Cakebread (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 14:54:50 UTC 
I changed Severity to major, since so many people are having problems.
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 15:23:50 UTC 
the ChangeLog entry doesnt refer to that ... look at the diffs in cvs ... 
 
azarah: is it safe to re-mask it or should we just go with the flow ? 
 
http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1.ebuild.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
Comment 3 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 15:35:36 UTC 
If there is no major breakage, sure.
Comment 4 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 15:36:26 UTC 
SpanKY: comment #2.
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 15:44:18 UTC 
welp, lets deal with the bugs as they come ;) 
 
i know ive used this baselayout on many boxes w/out probs