The ChangeLog says it was unmasked for ~sparc, but looking at the ebuild I see x86 unmasked also. Was this by mistake or was ChangeLog wrong? There are an awful lot of people on the forums reporting problems. *baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1 22 Jun 2003; Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1.ebuild: Changed ~sparc to sparc in KEYWORDS
I changed Severity to major, since so many people are having problems.
the ChangeLog entry doesnt refer to that ... look at the diffs in cvs ... azarah: is it safe to re-mask it or should we just go with the flow ? http://cvs.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselayout-1.8.6.8-r1.ebuild.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
If there is no major breakage, sure.
SpanKY: comment #2.
welp, lets deal with the bugs as they come ;) i know ive used this baselayout on many boxes w/out probs