Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 232016 - [PATCH] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0 doesn't save toolbar positions
Summary: [PATCH] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0 doesn't save toolbar positions
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: Qt Bug Alias
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-16 23:14 UTC by Elias Probst
Modified: 2009-02-14 21:26 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Elias Probst 2008-07-16 23:14:15 UTC
KDE4 applications like Konqueror, Akregator etc. have major issues saving their toolbar positions. It's IMHO a real showstopper, as the toolbars move nearly completely off-screen after a restart of the application.
Luckily there's already a patch in qt-copy available, which should be applied in Gentoo to x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open a KDE4 application like Kontact
2. Close it
3. Open the application again

Actual Results:  
The 2nd toolbar (e.g. the one of the embedded component in Kontact, like the 'Back | Forward | Reload ...' buttons in Kontact → Akregator) is moved off-screen to the right, just the handle for grabbing it is left over.

Expected Results:  
The toolbar stays at the position it was before closing the application.

A patch from qt-copy is available here:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/qt-copy/patches/0236-qtoolbararealayout-restore.diff?revision=829466&view=markup

What needs to be done:
- put the '0236-qtoolbararealayout-restore.diff' into qt-gui's $FILESDIR
- bump x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.0 to 4.4.0-r1
- add the according epatch line to the 4.4.0-r1 ebuild
Comment 1 Ben de Groot (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-12-04 01:28:25 UTC
CC'ing kde herd. Is this still a problem with qt-gui-4.4.2?
Comment 2 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-12-04 01:30:44 UTC
I dont have this issue and i think that it was already applied by upstream.
Comment 3 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-02-14 21:26:54 UTC
This issue is already fixed by upstream. thus closing