231792 – sys-cluster/gnbd-kernel-2.02.00: bad check sum on cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz

Bug 231792 - sys-cluster/gnbd-kernel-2.02.00: bad check sum on cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz

Summary: sys-cluster/gnbd-kernel-2.02.00: bad check sum on cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz

Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Cluster Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-07-14 18:13 UTC by Randy Smith
Modified:	2010-09-10 18:51 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Randy Smith 2008-07-14 18:13:31 UTC

The checksum for the file cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz is incorrect. sys-cluster/gnbd contains the correct checksum.

Reproducible: Always

Actual Results:  
The entry in Manifest is:
DIST cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz 8316680 RMD160 3d054699b91f57d8b07d7013dd718a7662d712aa SHA1 8471618222882427ca395f098695c33d2466559c SHA256 c68a62b49780a59dcf075e57fc2aac4524dd27e63ad80c8a2f1313307bca9498

Expected Results:  
The entry in Manifest should be (see sys-cluster/gnbd/Manifest):
DIST cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz 1764851 RMD160 b5a56a0ae69c2959c85e5e89319f96c974d8efb1 SHA1 c86510ed8be84704271c10466cd5a4732eb5f6c9 SHA256 92117aa02d17cdde9ae7d6e71c2b12314a99e24e90f131c491e97d8fbda52196

Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-07-14 20:18:24 UTC

-DIST cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz 8316680 RMD160 3d054699b91f57d8b07d7013dd718a7662d712aa SHA1 8471618222882427ca395f098695c33d2466559c SHA256 c68a62b49780a59dcf075e57fc2aac4524dd27e63ad80c8a2f1313307bca9498
+DIST cluster-2.02.00.tar.gz 1764851 RMD160 b5a56a0ae69c2959c85e5e89319f96c974d8efb1 SHA1 c86510ed8be84704271c10466cd5a4732eb5f6c9 SHA256 92117aa02d17cdde9ae7d6e71c2b12314a99e24e90f131c491e97d8fbda52196

Confirmed.

Comment 2 Fabian Henze 2008-09-27 13:32:01 UTC

confirm, please fix this. digest errors are very annoying

Comment 3 Christian Zoffoli (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-11-14 00:23:42 UTC

RH initially published a different package with a different digest.

now I've removed 2.02.xx from the portage, please try the last ebuild.

Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-11-14 02:58:25 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> RH initially published a different package with a different digest.
> 
> now I've removed 2.02.xx from the portage, please try the last ebuild.

I have no idea what this means. You haven't removed the 2.02.00 ebuild. There's a 2.03.09 which isn't in the tree. And on top of it all you RESOLVE the bug report as WONTFIX while you clearly state you do/are going to fix the issue.