Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 228961 - =media-gfx/ristretto-0.0.20 segfaults on HPPA without RANDR extension
Summary: =media-gfx/ristretto-0.0.20 segfaults on HPPA without RANDR extension
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: HPPA Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: XFCE Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-22 20:54 UTC by Samuli Suominen (RETIRED)
Modified: 2008-11-27 18:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
media-gfx/ristretto-0.0.20 gdb backtrace (ristretto-gdb.out,26.52 KB, text/plain)
2008-10-08 16:41 UTC, Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-22 20:54:10 UTC
It's a image viewer, mostly for Xfce4 (but I'm using it in fluxbox, so....)
Comment 1 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-24 10:05:45 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 2 Kenneth Prugh (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-25 15:42:08 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 3 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-25 17:27:17 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 4 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-25 19:00:30 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 5 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-27 20:28:40 UTC
alpha/ia64/sparc stable
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-19 16:05:48 UTC
ristretto has a nasty bug where it initially loads well and does generate thumbnails but ultimately segfaults, for instance when I click on where the larger image itself ought to have appeared. Want a new bug for that?
Comment 7 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-07-31 17:22:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> ristretto has a nasty bug where it initially loads well and does generate
> thumbnails but ultimately segfaults, for instance when I click on where the
> larger image itself ought to have appeared. 

Ouch.

> Want a new bug for that?

Only if you are willing to open it at bugs.xfce.org for upstream, as they are best to review the backtrace of the segmentation fault / system information etc.
If not, please just attach the required data here so I can forward it...

pst, the upstream is one person, using "sarts" nick at freenode
Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-10-08 16:41:43 UTC
Created attachment 167630 [details]
media-gfx/ristretto-0.0.20 gdb backtrace
Comment 9 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-20 16:49:28 UTC
ping
Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-20 17:32:19 UTC
Example shell output (the filename or filetype differs from the gdb backtrace's, but it doesn't matter as ristretto always segfaults on click events in the main picture viewer, and never displays images in the main picture viewer anyway).

jeroen@elmer /keeps/gentoo/samplefiles/images/raw $ ristretto CRW_3057.CRW
Xlib:  extension "RANDR" missing on display ":1.0".

(ristretto:1647): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed

(ristretto:1647): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_pointer: assertion `G_VALUE_HOLDS_POINTER (value)' failed
Xlib:  extension "RANDR" missing on display ":1.0".
Segmentation fault
Comment 11 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-26 22:41:39 UTC
00:40 <+ssuominen> sarts: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228961
00:40 <+ssuominen> sarts: do you want me to copy this bug to xfce's bugzilla with the backtrace?
00:41 <+sarts> nope
00:41 <+sarts> fixed in trunk
Comment 12 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-26 22:45:03 UTC
00:42 <+sarts> I told the fedora peeps to cherry-pick a patch from a certain revision.
00:42 <+sarts> but I forgot which one
00:42 <+sarts> it was a patch by kalikiana 

maybe we should just cherry-pick this patch from fedora? anyway, i'm not in xfce herd anymore. just heads up guys.
Comment 13 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-27 15:52:51 UTC
should be fixed in 0.0.21 then
Comment 14 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-27 18:16:54 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> should be fixed in 0.0.21 then

Confirmed. Thanks. I've marked 0.0.20 -hppa and 0.0.21 stable so we have something current stable again.